Search for: "Marks v. Howe" Results 281 - 300 of 14,199
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2008, 12:44 pm
If it functions as a mark how can it be abandoned, which is defined as losing significance as a mark? [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Remember how Sir Robin Jacob characterised "limping marks" and got a bit of a ticking off from the Court of Appeal in Philips v Remington? [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 4:15 am
TTABlogger comment: Since the marks are not similar for Section 2(d) purposes, how can they be similar for Section 43(c) purposes? [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 3:06 pm
These cases could be reconciled, however, on the basis that the trade mark functions we are concerned with are the right to decide which goods to sell under the trade mark in the EEA and how they should be marketed. (3) Honest concurrent use. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:51 pm
How can this be when the CJEU itself has already ruled out the visual similarity between the signs based on the same elements? [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 4:46 am
How strange, then, that a matter as fundamental as the right of a shopping centre operator to register its name as a trade mark should have had to wait so long for a definitive ruling. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 6:40 pm
As was stated by Lamer J. in Insurance Corp. of British Columbia v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 2:34 pm by Minick Law
Answer: Yes, according to the recent Court of Appeals decision in State v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 11:15 am
How many have readers have addressed a letter to “Head Office” and trusted it would reach the correct individual? [read post]