Search for: "Marriage of Perry"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,093
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2013, 3:27 pm
Perry, 570 U. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 3:18 pm
Perry, John Roberts, LGBT, Marriage, Maryland v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 3:08 pm
Perry. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:40 pm
Perry (Prop 8) case, assuming that the Court first saw its way clear to finding standing on the part of the official proponents of Prop 8. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:25 pm
Turning to Perry, what should one make of the decision to avoid the merits altogether? [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:00 pm
Perry, a case testing the constitutionality of Proposition 8, California’s voter referendum making same-sex marriage unconstitutional. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:37 pm
In re-reading the marriage cases this afternoon, something struck me: where are the liberals? [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:30 pm
Perry, the Court dismissed due to a lack of jurisdiction over the appeal. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:30 pm
Perry, the Court dismissed due to a lack of jurisdiction over the appeal. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:35 pm
If that were not enough, the Supreme Court’s companion decision, Hollingsworth v Perry, No. 12-144, decided June 26, 2013, leaves in place a determination, under California state law, that same-sex partners could not be denied the benefits of marriage. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:32 pm
If that were not enough, the Supreme Court’s companion decision, Hollingsworth v Perry, No. 12-144, decided June 26, 2013, leaves in place a determination, under California state law, that same-sex partners could not be denied the benefits of marriage. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:11 pm
Perry, In-House Counsel, In-house counseling, Law Clerks, Pro Bono, Prop 8, Proposition 8, SCOTUS, Supreme Court [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 11:24 am
Perry – joined by the unlikely coalition of Justices Scalia, Ginsburg, Breyer, and Kagan – that the private group seeking to appeal from the district court’s invalidation of California’s Prop 8 lacked standing to do so, while anything but legally obvious, was at least defensible – and again quite predictable. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 10:12 am
So marriage equality will proceed state by state. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 9:52 am
Perry, the Supreme Court refused to decide the issue of the constitutionality of Proposition 8, a 2008 California voter-passed initiative amending the California Constitution to define marriage as between "a man and a woman." [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:52 am
Perry, PDF, the Prop 8 case, written by the Chief Justice. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:50 am
We congratulate the Perry team on their incredible achievement – persuading the Court to allow California to become the 13th state (and the District of Columbia) to embrace marriage for everyone. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:34 am
Perry – affirming lower court decision striking down Cal. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:19 am
Perry, a challenge to California’s controversial Proposition 8 measure, and a case out of New York, U.S. v Windsor, which considers the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:10 am
The argument for standing is actually stronger in Perry, where the Court (with a strange lineup of Justices) said that there was no standing. [read post]
