Search for: "Marshall v. Superior Court"
Results 281 - 300
of 322
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2018, 4:00 am
After being named to a shortlist by an advisory committee including several representatives from the legal community, Justice Marshall Rothstein became, in 2006, the first Supreme Court appointee to answer questions before a [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 12:45 am
The Court had asked for briefing on whether Jackson should be overturned in the context of Montejo v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Nonetheless, the Supreme Court has issued decisions making any such reforms difficult to adopt and enforce. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
Lujan v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
As Confederate Vice President Alexander Stephens made clear: Our new government is founded upon . . . its foundations are laid, its corner-stone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race is his natural and normal condition. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 8:43 am
Supreme Court discussed the financial position of the parties, including defendant's superior earning capacity, and otherwise adequately explained its reasons for awarding counsel fees. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am
Unlike the Brookings report, the list that follows is not based principally on court documents. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(IP finance) Global - Patents Study published in Science magazine ‘Promoting Intellectual Discovery: Patents Versus Markets’ concludes free markets superior to patent monopolies (Ars Technica) (Techdirt) Economic woes impact valuations, but not all sectors are suffering (Technology Transfer Tactics) Cancer Institute study show impact of patent age on deal probability (Technology Transfer Tactics) Should management be involved in patenting decisions? [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 10:33 am
" FireStar, Amphion, and their Foley lawyers worked out a litigation budget of $4.4 million to take the case against Red Hat to trial in Marshall, Texas. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 2:15 pm
The very essence of the military job is to marshal physical force, to remove every obstacle to its effectiveness, to give it every strategic advantage. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 3:18 am
Alabama: The Lynd Case The third case, Lynd v Marshall County Pediatrics, P.C., No. 1160683 [Ala. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 9:24 pm
McLaughlin v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
Marshal was the victim of a seriously flawed system. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
Marshal was the victim of a seriously flawed system. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the People’… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the People’… [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 6:50 am
Daniel Webster is thought to have coined that phrase in his oral arguments in the Supreme Court case, McCulloch v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
” Supreme Court Justice Robert Grier in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 6:32 am
Both sides had justifications why they should receive a premium to sell, including past expenditures of time and money and a claimed superiority in management ability, it was fairly clear was that the premium requested by each was the consideration for the emotional price of walking away. [read post]
