Search for: "Martin v. Powers" Results 281 - 300 of 1,423
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2020, 11:15 am by Adam Feldman
She expressed a similar concern last term in her powerful dissent in Knick v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 12:49 pm by Linda McClain
Martin Luther King, Jr., who, in 1967, referred to the “millions who have morally risen above prevailing prejudices” and were “willing to share power and to accept structural alterations of society even at the cost of traditional privilege. [read post]
25 May 2020, 10:30 am by Guest Blogger
That’s a theoretical purpose – but not ideal theory: I am consciously making a normative argument in light of realist assumptions about power and law.The reviewers are thoughtful, their views serious. [read post]
5 May 2020, 11:51 am by William Ford
The subcommittee staff’s analysis of the constitutionality of remote voting and participation focused heavily on whether a proposed change to the Senate’s rules, or the adoption of a new rule, would comply with the three-part test the Supreme Court established in United States v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
 John Marshall ended his first paragraph in McCulloch v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Madison, and the Missouri Crisis are told alongside less familiar ones like Martin v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 3:00 am by Joshua Holt
His high-profile cases include the “trial of the century,” otherwise known as United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 2:40 pm by Lucas Guttentag
Indeed, even if one were somehow to construe the statute as an immigration authority, the provision does not include a deportation power. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:30 am by Merpel
Emergency legislation is being drafted which is likely to contain clauses that expand the powers in criminal courts to use technology in a wider range of hearings. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:38 am by Jack Goldsmith, Ben Miller-Gootnick
It is enough for our purposes to show that the matter is genuinely contested and that there is a powerful argument that legislative succession is unconstitutional. [read post]