Search for: "Mattel Inc." Results 281 - 300 of 503
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2009, 2:55 pm
., jury awarded Mattel, Inc. $100 million in damages in a closely followed copyright-infringement lawsuit. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Class 99) United States US General Wisconsin judge vacates $ 1.26 billion judgment in default against PepsiCo (IPKat) (IP Factor) California Court of Appeal: Von Dutch tradename settlement gives rise to legal malpractice action and questionable mediation confidentiality decision: Michael Cassel v Superior Court of Los Angeles County (The IP ADR Blog) US Patent Reform Putting the USPTO to work for independent inventors (Director's Forum) (Inventive Step) (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) (Patently-O)… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Class 99)   United States US General Wisconsin judge vacates $ 1.26 billion judgment in default against PepsiCo (IPKat) (IP Factor) California Court of Appeal: Von Dutch tradename settlement gives rise to legal malpractice action and questionable mediation confidentiality decision: Michael Cassel v Superior Court of Los Angeles County (The IP ADR Blog)   US Patent Reform Putting the USPTO to work for independent inventors (Director's Forum) (Inventive Step) (IP Asset Maximizer Blog)… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Class 99) United States US General Wisconsin judge vacates $ 1.26 billion judgment in default against PepsiCo (IPKat) (IP Factor) California Court of Appeal: Von Dutch tradename settlement gives rise to legal malpractice action and questionable mediation confidentiality decision: Michael Cassel v Superior Court of Los Angeles County (The IP ADR Blog) US Patent Reform Putting the USPTO to work for independent inventors (Director's Forum) (Inventive Step) (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) (Patently-O)… [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 3:02 am by John L. Welch
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard oral argument [mp3 here] in an appeal from the TTAB's decision in Mattel, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 3:59 am
Mattel, Inc., 128 S.Ct. 1396 (2008), "primarily as a 'judicial gloss on the specific grounds for vacatur enumerated in section 10 of the FAA. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 3:07 am
Mattel, Inc. (#), three circuits are already in ripe disagreement as to whether Hall Street abrogates the half-century old, judicially-created doctrine of "manifest disregard. [read post]