Search for: "Matter of Booker" Results 281 - 300 of 556
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2012, 9:34 am
Are media folk like David Gregory actually conservative when it comes to financial matters? [read post]
22 May 2012, 9:12 am by Lovechilde
Bain and its shareholders profited in the end, no matter what else happened. [read post]
5 May 2012, 1:00 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
S. 350, 359 (1989), and the same approach is appropriate here, where the issue concerns a matter of discretion traditionally committed to the Judiciary. [read post]
5 May 2012, 12:17 pm by Michael O'Hear
In addressing this claim, the Court assumed for the sake of argument that Booker reasonableness review applies to the consecutive/concurrent decision. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:12 pm by Lyle Denniston
On November 18, 1999, 14 days after his 14th birthday, he and two older youths, Derrick Shields and Travis Booker, decided to rob a local video store, Movie Magic. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:19 pm by Orin Kerr
Booker-esque combination of two sets of Justices, which in addition to being complicated wasn’t needed because at least the result was settled in this case. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:52 pm by admin
Booker does not think that either his mother or brother would ever have approved of allowing a family matter to become a public dispute that features unfounded allegations and name calling, according to Booker. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 5:59 am by David Oscar Markus
Lanny Breuer is complaining about sentencing after Booker, saying there needs to be more consistency. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 2:03 pm by familoo
But except at the extremes it is essentially a matter of degree, a spectrum. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 5:42 am by SHG
Some experts say the process has become coercive in many state and federal jurisdictions, forcing defendants to weigh their options based on the relative risks of facing a judge and jury rather than simple matters of guilt or innocence. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 1:28 pm by Melina Padron
The law blogger, Carl Gardner, has been concerned about this case, and in particular about John Hemming’s use of parliamentary privilege, since last April, and in his latest post on the matter he recounts his quest since then to get to the bottom of this. [read post]