Search for: "Matter of Brown v City of New York" Results 281 - 300 of 324
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2009, 3:00 am
This was the reasoning applied by the New York state appellate court sitting in Manhattan in upholding a mandatory arbitration clause in a contract for the purchase of a computer by telephone or mail in Brower v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am by Patent Arcade Staff
Cir. 2007): Gamco alleged infringement by Multimedia’s central determinant system, as operated in the New York State Lottery. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 10:00 am
It's a journey that takes us back to a time before most of us were born, long before the Voting Rights Act, and the Civil Rights Act, Brown v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
City of Stamford, 699 A.2d 52, 55 & n.8 (Conn. 1997). [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
; Work Matters; Law.comArgued Awaiting Decision14 Penn Plaza LLC v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
However, the matter is remanded for clarification of findings at sentencing with regards to whether defendants possessed the firearms in connection with possession of cocaine. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
We've praised courts that have gotten this issue right - most significantly the New York Court of Appeals in the Arons case. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:06 pm
[Following is the text I've submitted as an article for Gay City News this week. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
  June 2006 Lettuce E. coli Outbreak In early August 2006, public health officials in a mid-sized city in Utah became aware that several people attending a teacher’s conference had contracted E. coli O121:H19 (a Shiga toxin-producing E. coli). [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Genao-Sanchez, No. 05-1402 Sentence for drug conspiracy, conspiring to use a firearm in furtherance of a drug conspiracy, and aiding and abetting the commission of a crime, is vacated and remanded where: 1) the district court's failure to convene a new sentencing hearing deprived defendant the opportunity to argue his position both as to matters of fact relevant to sentencing, and as to the appropriate sentence to be imposed; and 2) thus, the error was prejudicial. [read post]