Search for: "Matter of Burr" Results 281 - 300 of 377
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Our Chicago defamation attorneys defend individuals’ First Amendment and free speech rights to post on Facebook, Yelp and other websites information that criticizes businesses and addresses matters of public concern. [read post]
Our Chicago defamation attorneys defend individuals’ First Amendment and free speech rights to post on Facebook, Yelp and other websites information that criticizes businesses and addresses matters of public concern. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 3:35 pm
Maearsk Contractors USA (CAFC 2009-1556) precedential Invalidity A patent shall not issue "if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 8:18 am by Frank Bowman
But as matters stand, every question ultimately rests in the unguided, and inevitably politically driven, discretion of a majority of senators. [read post]
Burr, an 1807 case involving a subpoena to President Thomas Jefferson, the majority made clear that the historical precedent weighed decidedly in one direction (and against the president). [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 8:00 am by Jessica Clogg
Because of the tax advantages charities receive, we are told, it is acceptable, and even desirable to limit charities involvement in public debate and public policy development on matters on which there is no societal consensus and thus uncertain societal benefit. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:00 am by Don Cruse
As a matter of first impression, we must determine whether the federal Ledbetter Act applies to a claim brought under the TCHRA so that the 180-day limitations period begins anew each time a claimant receives a paycheck containing a discriminatory amount. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 7:24 pm by Joy Waltemath
Ruling that the employer’s violation was willful as a matter of law, the appeals court first found that the employer’s interpretation of the statute was not objectively reasonable. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 3:44 am by SHG
Not that it wasn't happening, but that it didn't matter. [read post]
Leave it to President Trump to describe as “Total EXONERATION” a document that specifically quotes Special Counsel Robert Mueller as saying that one of his principal findings “does not exonerate” the president. [read post]
The complaint is framed in the language of the whistleblower statute: The writer states that he believes that the president’s actions “constitute ‘a serious or flagrant problem, abuse, or violation of law or Executive order’ that ‘does not include differences of opinions concerning public policy matters,’ consistent with the definition of an ‘urgent concern’ in” the statute. [read post]