Search for: "Matter of Cruz v Cruz" Results 281 - 300 of 392
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2012, 2:34 pm by Brad Pauley
   (Full disclosure:  Horvitz & Levy LLP is counsel for American States Insurance Company in this matter.) [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 3:30 am
Employee entitled to go for a cancer-screening examination without loss of pay or charge to leave accruals Moran v City of Saratoga Springs, et al, 21 Misc 3d 195 In Cruz et al v Wappingers CSD, Supreme Court, Dutchess County, Judge James V. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 2:28 am
A single market, perhaps, but the EU remains a patch- work of jurisdictions Last week the IPKat posted this note on the Opinion of Advocate General Cruz Villalón in Case C 616/10 Solvay SA v Honeywell Fluorine Products Europe BV, Honeywell Belgium NV and Honeywell Europe NV on the need to take a more subtle, "nuanced" approach when deciding when a single European Union national court might rule on patent infringement and invalidity issues that have been raised in… [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 3:33 pm
It gave us the slip for a while and dipped beneath the Kats' radar, but the Opinion of Advocate General Cruz Villalón in Case C 616/10 Solvay SA v Honeywell Fluorine Products Europe BV, Honeywell Belgium NV and Honeywell Europe NV was bound to end up on the blogosphere eventually. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  The Ninth Circuit held that the FAA, as interpreted in Concepcion, preempts the California Supreme Court's Broughton and Cruz decisions, which held that CLRA and UCL claims seeking public injunctions are not arbitrable as a matter of public policy. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 12:50 pm by WIMS
      The district court dismissed the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on the ground the CWA precludes a preenforcement challenge to a TNW Determination. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
In Matter of Paula Cruz De Ortiz, 25 I & N Dec 601 (BIA 2011), the Board essentially ruled that the 5 year statute of limitations which applies to both rescission and removal proceedings to remove an alien who procures permanent residence through fraud or misrepresentation only applies to those who have adjusted their status. [read post]