Search for: "Matter of David H."
Results 281 - 300
of 1,447
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2020, 9:58 am
H. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am
And the subject matter—“unilateralist presidencies and submissive legislatures”—is of great interest to me. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
Of course, Dershowitz may very well be correct that, as a matter of personal psychology, most people with the healthy ego required to seek high office probably do think they’ll do a better job than the next guy.But that psychological supposition is really neither here nor there. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 3:36 pm
Rehnquist or Justices Antonin Scalia, Sandra Day O'Connor or David H. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 7:54 am
Weighing up all of this is significantly a matter of personal judgment—not of simply applying some supposedly pre-ordained formula. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 11:41 am
Lederman and David C. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
Mark Stern warns at Slate that “[h]owever this case turns out, it is only a matter of time before the court’s conservatives again manipulate the free exercise clause to finance religious exercise with taxpayer money. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 11:43 am
Phipps, and David Kurlander; originally published here: https://www.dlapiper.com/en/asiapacific/insights/publications/2020/01/sec-proposes-changes-to-accredited-investor-definition/. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 11:43 am
Phipps, and David Kurlander; originally published here: https://www.dlapiper.com/en/asiapacific/insights/publications/2020/01/sec-proposes-changes-to-accredited-investor-definition/. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 7:26 am
In addition to the often cited passage of Kitchin J in Generics v H Lundbeck ([2007] EWHC 1040) on the factors for obviousness, Lord Hodge added &ldq [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
But that actiontook a February a knock back as details of a letter from Saskia Florence at the US Copyright Office to Ribeiro's attorney, David Hecht surfaced as part of federal court documents in California. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:50 am
Charge two alleged that the respondent neglected a legal matter entrusted to him, in violation of rule 1.3(b) of the Rules of Professional Conduct (22 NYCRR 1200.0), as follows: Beginning in or about 2009, the respondent represented Louis Wenger (hereinafter Wenger) in two related judicial dissolution proceedings commenced by Wenger’s son, David Wenger (hereinafter David), entitled David Wenger v L.A. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
Geoffrey Stone is the Edward H. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 11:16 am
Diaz or Joshua H. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
Although Gordon characterized Gray’s footnote 12 as a “h[o]ld[ing],” we should mention that this remark in Gordon was itself not essential to Gordon’s outcome.One possible reason for skepticism about Gray’s footnote 12 is that in many American elections votes for losing candidates are “discarded” in this way. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 12:05 pm
Diaz or Joshua H. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:16 am
” The regulation specified, in particular, that:In exercising this authority, the Special Prosecutor will have the greatest degree of independence that is consistent with the Attorney General's statutory accountability for matters falling within the jurisdiction of the Department of Justice. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 5:51 am
Park and Howard H. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
David’s discussion of these matters is detailed, meticulous, and fair. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 9:04 am
Matter of Michael R. v. [read post]
