Search for: "Matter of English v Smith"
Results 281 - 300
of 323
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am
In that context, it has been held that “the values enshrined in Articles 8 and 10 are now part of the cause of action for breach of confidence” (See Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd [2004] 2 AC 457 at [17] (Lord Nicholls) and that it is necessary to consider Strasbourg jurisprudence to establish the scope of that domestic cause of action, since those Articles are now “not merely of persuasive or parallel effect” but are “the very content of the… [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:15 am
V .R. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:14 pm
Smith ... [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 11:51 am
Smith (1879), 11 Ch. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 2:18 am
Forum June 14, 2006) (comparing TIRE DISCOUNTERS and ), for example, is one of those small differences that matters in this context, citing Entrepreneur Media, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:37 pm
Anti-suit injunctions are a creature of English law. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 10:04 am
As far as we are aware, this is the first example of a purely “private” intervention in a private law case in the English courts. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 2:00 am
Gaza conflict a “lawful excuse” In R v ? [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 4:54 am
While the rest of the world has its eyes trained on the United States, desperately seeking first sight of In re Bilski, patent litigation is still taking place elsewhere, as is evidenced by last week's carefully-framed decision in KCI Licensing Inc and others v Smith and Nephew plc and others [2010] EWHC 1487 (Pat), a ruling of Mr Justice Arnold (Patents Court for England and Wales).Right: the IPKat is all in favour of dressings that don't press on his earsThis case, the… [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm
" (Oxford English Dict. (2d ed. 1989) at [as of Jan. 31, 2003].) [read post]
16 May 2010, 9:00 pm
He was charged and remanded in custody where he remained until the matter came before the Crown Court. [read post]
9 May 2010, 10:00 am
However, until recently the English law did not recognise any right to receive information. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 7:19 am
In Smith v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 2:11 pm
” Smith Kline & French Laboratories, Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:37 am
Eriq Gardner at THR, Esq. has the story, as does Ray Beckerman at Recording Industry v. the People. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 11:48 am
Plaintiff is not a fluent English speaker, so she asked her uncle Mr. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 5:43 am
See Reynolds v. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 2:36 pm
Finally, in West Tankers the European Court of Justice was asked to rule on an anti-suit injunction issued by English courts in order to prevent Italian courts from proceeding with an action in disregard of an arbitration clause.23 The Grand Chamber held that an anti suit injunction in support of an arbitration clause was irreconcilable with the principle of mutual trust and that the Italian courts were deemed to apply the Brussels I Regulation and Article II of the New York Convention… [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 5:42 am
from Colleen McGushins’ Work Matters. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
Burrows v Smith (1709 Copyright Blog) (IPKat) UK MP’s frozen out of ACTA (Michael Geist) (IPKat) HMRC on the attack on image rights? [read post]
