Search for: "Matter of Kagan" Results 281 - 300 of 2,790
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2010, 7:02 am by Erin Miller
At the conference, Kagan skirted the subject of the impending nomination. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by SHG
Timing of course matters, though not in the split-second, elements based way the Government proposes. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
” But this interpretation based on the meaning of the word “appoint” can’t be right as a general matter. [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:09 pm by Holly
The post Andy Warhol at the Supreme Court: For Fair Use, Context Matters appeared first on Business & Litigation Lawyers . [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 9:09 am
On that general issue, all the justices disagree, but Justices Scalia, Thomas and Kagan disagreed on how (and whether) to apply the standard in this case. [read post]
12 May 2010, 7:15 am by Brandon Bartels
The debate over Elena Kagan’s lack of judging experience is heating up. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 12:29 pm
Justice Alito topped Justice Kagan at page 11, lines 7-13. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 5:34 pm by Jon Penney
Either Kagan or Wood would be only the second Chicago professor (joining Justice Scalia)...[...]....Elena Kagan would also bring notable educational diversity to the Court. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 5:50 am by Jon Hyman
Sure, the Senate confirmed Elena Kagan to a seat on the Supreme Court, but otherwise it seems like everyone (but me) are away on their summer vacations. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
That's a distinction that could have significance in a number of contexts.Why might it matter to the law whether some expression is a joke? [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 4:53 am
Over at Bench Memos, Ed Whelan -- one of our favorite commentators on matters judicial -- provides a great account of Justice Antonin Scalia's recent visit to his alma mater, Harvard Law School. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 1:53 pm by Will Baude
Shelby County’s lawyer, Bert Rein, did not respond by telling Justice Kagan she was wrong about this — just that it did not matter because the formula was being challenged on its face. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 6:11 am by Lovechilde
Justice Kennedy (joined by the so-called liberal wing of the Court -- Justices Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan and Breyer) rejected the dissenters' view that states may be allowed to prevent gays and lesbians from getting married if a majority of its voters deem it so. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:46 pm by Tun-Jen Chiang
  Given the stakes, it is only a matter of time before this issue returns. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:28 am by Marty Lederman
As Justice Kagan said, that isn't "anything but a great choice. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 7:58 am by Jonathan H. Adler
(This matters because at the time of Lucia's case before the SEC, the ALJs had not been appointed in a manner consistent with that clause.) [read post]