Search for: "Matter of Kagan" Results 281 - 300 of 2,794
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2023, 2:30 pm by Evan Lee
Isn’t the truth of the matter here that Congress just made a mistake? [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
No matter how sharp Scalia's rhetoric was in opinions, he always expressed admiration for Ginsburg in public speeches as well as in private correspondences. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
That's a distinction that could have significance in a number of contexts.Why might it matter to the law whether some expression is a joke? [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 11:09 am by Josh Blackman
Justice Kagan recently mused that maybe she has no sense of humor. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm by Guest Author
Two of his targets include centralized OIRA review of agency rulemaking and presidential administration (a la Justice Kagan). [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 12:59 pm by Ronald Mann
Although not as dogmatic about the matter, Justice Elena Kagan also seemed firmly on the side of the customers. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 9:52 am by Ilya Somin
But it also matters to textualists, as drafters' views provide at least some evidence of the "ordinary meaning" of a statute at the time of enactment. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 5:49 am by David Bernstein
The phrase "racial diversity" came up in oral argument thirty-eight times, with Justices Kagan and Sotomayor in particular pressing counsel on the issue. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 8:25 am by Andrew Frisch
Writing for the court, Justice Elena Kagan stated that “[i]n demanding that an employee receive a fixed amount for a week no matter how many days he has worked, §602(a) embodies the standard meaning of the word ‘salary’” which generally refers to a “steady and predictable stream of pay. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 4:31 am by SHG
EPA, Justice Elena Kagan complains that MQD has become “a get-out-of-text free card. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 1:27 pm by Ilya Somin
EPA, Justice Elena Kagan complains that MQD has become "a get-out-of-text free card. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 4:40 am by Michael C. Dorf
My further point was and is that the need for the right kind of relation between the alleged unlawfulness and the alleged injury is not simply a matter of prudential third-party standing but best understood as an Article III limit. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 9:51 pm by Josh Blackman
As a threshold matter, the identity of the authoring Justices should not come as a surprise. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 12:21 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Justice Barrett dissented, joined by Justices Thomas, Sotomayor and Kagan. [read post]