Search for: "Matter of Kerr v Kerr"
Results 281 - 300
of 878
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2012, 11:09 pm
The Court cited Kerr v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:12 am
In R (E & Ors) v DPP [2011] EWHC 1465, Munby LJ observed an unmistakable absence of any reported case holding that art 8 could be used to challenge criminal proceedings for a matter falling squarely within the criminal law. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 12:31 am
So it's the first part that matters more broadly. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 1:15 am
Lord Kerr (dissenting) in a poignant judgement raised a number of issues with his fellow Lord’s reasoning. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 10:37 am
In Carpenter v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 1:02 am
He also notes the matter of the amount of data required for all class members is not a matter for this stage of the case. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 4:18 am
Everything about this litigation means that those optics matter. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 7:24 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 5:54 pm
Orin Kerr and David Kopel both analyze the case at Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 6:14 am
Co. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 2:27 am
See United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 3:20 am
Held: allowing the appeal; it would be a mistake to view patients as uninformed, incapable of understanding medical matters, or wholly dependent on information from doctors. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 1:47 am
Permission to appeal has been granted by a panel of three Justices (Lord Neuberger, Lord Mance and Lord Kerr) and the case can now proceed to a full hearing. [read post]
13 May 2020, 2:30 am
Lord Kerr, delivering judgment, held that even if a presumption exists that Parliament intends Carltona to apply, it was displaced by a proper interpretation of articles 4(1) and 4 (2) of the 1972 Order read together. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 8:01 am
Ashby Jones at the Wall Street Journal Law Blog has excerpts from both Greenhouse’s post and Orin Kerr’s response (to which Adam also linked yesterday); at Reason, Damon Root sides largely with Kerr, concluding that “Scalia does have a point. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 1:45 pm
See also note 3: “For our review, it does not matter how any eventual search would be carried out. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 2:25 pm
Burnet v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 10:26 am
” Nix v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 5:02 pm
This recently happened in a Kansas federal district court case, Kerr v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 5:32 pm
Brief for Orin Kerr as Amicus Curiae 7 (urging adoption of code-based approach). [read post]
