Search for: "Matter of Kerr v Kerr"
Results 281 - 300
of 878
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2016, 8:23 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 4:45 am
Orin Kerr wants to make your day just a little bit worse. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 10:26 am
” Nix v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
The opinion has gotten some bounce, with pieces by Orin Kerr in the Post and by Jennifer Daskal and Elizabeth Goitein in Just Security. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
Lord Kerr (massively paraphrased): but has Parliament has not given citizens of the UK rights by way of the 1972 Act, and therefore would have to be consulted in order for them to be taken away? [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
15.56 Lord Mance asks if it would be a “catastrophe” for the devolution settlement if the legislative consent convention was not legally binding. 15.55 In response to questions from Lord Mance and Lord Kerr, the Lord Advocate notes that, in the current constitutional context, the UK Parliament has committed itself in statute to seeking the legislative consent of the Scottish Parliament on “devolved matters”. 15.50 The two Scottish Justices –… [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 1:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 11:00 am
Lords Hodge, Reed and Kerr are likely to utilise their Scottish and Irish legal backgrounds to address issues of the inter-relationship of national laws and devolved institutions. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 9:18 am
But I don’t see how that matters here. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 8:20 am
To make matters more complicated, the network is structured at one major provider so that only employees from inside the United States can query it. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 1:47 am
Permission to appeal has been granted by a panel of three Justices (Lord Neuberger, Lord Mance and Lord Kerr) and the case can now proceed to a full hearing. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 8:35 am
Lord Kerr noted in particular the procedural arrangements as set out in the Act and the suggestion that service may be postal. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 7:08 am
In People v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 8:35 am
See United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 7:00 am
Why might that matter? [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 12:29 pm
See Illinois v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 12:42 pm
See Arizona v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 7:40 am
What matters is the intrusion on the people’s security from governmental interference. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 1:38 pm
”); United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 1:03 pm
See Arizona v. [read post]
