Search for: "Matter of Lyles" Results 281 - 300 of 543
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2013, 7:49 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Beck at Federal Regulations Advisor, The BLT’s Tony Mauro, Paul Daly at Administrative Law Matters, and Jaclyn Belczyk at JURIST. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:48 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
At the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Steven Schwinn remarks that the case made clear that “there’s no fundamental right to public records” in the Constitution, but instead it is a matter for state legislatures. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 8:36 am by Julie Ganz
 If the case is simple, it may just be a matter of paying their attorney fees. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 11:23 am by Dennis Crouch
More from Lyle Denniston and Lisa Larrimore Ouellette. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:41 am by Rachel Sachs
Myriad Genetics, in which the Court is considering whether human genes are patent-eligible subject matter. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 8:11 am by Marty Lederman
  In light of the parties’ opening briefs and a preliminary review of some of those amicus briefs, including the landmark filing by the United States (see Lyle’s post), and the briefs of California and of thirteen other states (see my post here), it is more evident than ever that there are (at least) five possible outcomes in the case — a rich menu of choices for the Court. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am by Marty Lederman
But to begin, in this post I’ll discuss a couple of important preliminary matters that frame the unusual Article III questions in these two cases: I. [read post]
4 Nov 2012, 10:00 pm
I also think that killing animals for sport (or food, for that matter), is wrong. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 11:11 am by Graham Martin
Given the importance of maintaining attorney-client confidentiality to encourage clients to be candid with their lawyers, it seems that the ruling on this matter has the potential to be rather important in setting the tone for future challenges to privileged communications. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 2:56 pm by admin
Springer Lyle will post any updates to the court’s decisions as this case progresses. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 9:44 am by Michael Lowe
  So when cops decide to use their weapons to harm or kill citizens without apparent justification or reasonable need, then it may become a matter of illegal and dangerous “excessive force” and it’s something that needs to be stopped. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 10:15 am by Raffaela Wakeman
District Court Chief Judge Royce Lamberth announcing that he will resolve the matter. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 7:11 am by Eugene Kontorovich
[Lyle published an introduction to the issues in the case at the start of the symposium.] [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:43 pm by Donald Childress
  To be sure, the Second Circuit emphasized that it was only speaking to subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 9:49 am by Oona Hathaway
 [Lyle published an introduction to the issues in the case at the start of the symposium.] [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 7:21 am by Ingrid Wuerth
  [Lyle published an introduction to the issues in Kiobel last week.] [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:37 am by Oona Hathaway
 [Lyle published an introduction to the issues in Kiobel last week.] [read post]