Search for: "Matter of M. M. v A. A." Results 281 - 300 of 15,505
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm by Michael Lowe
According to the USSC: 9% had little or no prior criminal history (Criminal History Category I); 7% were CHC II; 8% were CHC III; 2% were CHC IV; 5% were CHC V; 9% were CHC VI. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:55 am
Burke, I’m hoping that you will be in a different situation, not on a phone. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 1:34 pm
I understand Part II, but I'm seriously thinking deeply about Part III. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
Since Mrs Justice Collins Rice handed down judgment in Fox v Blake [2024] EWHC 146 (KB) there has been a lot of online discussion about the case. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 8:15 am by Bruce Ackerman
It is for this reason that Smith v. [read post]