Search for: "May v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc."
Results 281 - 300
of 869
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am
Braun, 14-1123, and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:26 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Fla: Dist. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 131 S. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 131 S. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 131 S. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:57 am
The Eighth Circuit, in a 2:1 decision, upheld that verdict, rejecting arguments by the employer that (1) the case should never have been certified given differences in time spent among the class; (2) the use of statistics was improper and constituted “Trial by Formula” in violation of the teachings of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm
June 8, 2015), a case that raises important issues on how class and collective actions are certified and adjudicated—and may allow the Court to provide further guidance on questions it addressed in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 7:16 am
On appeal, Tyson contended that certification was improper because employees’ individual routines varied and, thus, the litigation could not generate common answers apt to drive the resolution of the litigation as required under Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
In agreeing to hear Tyson’s case, the Court took no action on a pair of petitions raising similar issues, by the huge retail chain, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:59 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am
Braun, 14-1123, and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 10:45 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 3:17 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., May 18, 2015, Olguin, F.). [read post]
13 May 2015, 5:25 am
Finding that the district court fundamentally misapprehended the reach of Wal-MartStores, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 9:36 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., the First District Court of Appeal held that a pharmacist could be found negligent for continuing to prescribe a potent painkiller even though the prescription didn’t have a time limit because continuing to prescribe the medication created an obvious risk of a customer’s death absent a particular drug regime. 878 So. 2d 426, 427-28 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 5:12 am
In Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 8:44 am
Moreover, a supervisor’s alleged statement that that “[s]he could do more when she was younger than she can now” was a stray remark and not tied to his firing (Dominick v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., March 16, 2015, Teilborg, J.). [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 7:39 pm
The court explained that under the 2006 Texas Supreme Court case Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:39 am
Analysis: The Court relied on the Court of Appeals decision of Bennett Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. v. [read post]
