Search for: "McCann v. McCann"
Results 281 - 300
of 379
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2010, 3:24 pm
Their Lordships had not considered it needed revisiting in the light of McCann v UK. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:24 pm
Their Lordships had not considered it needed revisiting in the light of McCann v UK. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 2:15 am
In Steel and Morris v United Kingdom ((2005) 41 EHRR 22) it was held that an award of £40,000 against defendants of modest resources was disproportionate ([96]). [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 6:48 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Divison) Dhorajiwala, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 1237 (09 June 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Morge, R (on the application of) v Hampshire County Council [2010] EWCA Civ 608 (10 June 2010) Beechwood Birmingham Ltd v Hoyer Group UK Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 647 (10 June 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Baxter & Ors v McCann [2010] EWHC 1330 (QB) (10 June 2010) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 2:42 pm
With more than a week having passed since the Supreme Court's ruling in American Needle v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 5:47 pm
This week on the legal-affairs podcast Lawyer2Lawyer, we discuss the Supreme Court’s May 24 opinion in American Needle v. [read post]
30 May 2010, 8:00 am
McCann, 2010 U.S. [read post]
27 May 2010, 10:15 am
With a unanimous vote, the Surpreme Court ruled 9-0 against the NFL in the American Needle v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 8:10 am
With a unanimous vote, the Surpreme Court ruled 9-0 against the NFL in the American Needle v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 6:46 am
In her report on American Needle Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 9:02 am
This was first posted on 16 March 2010 and is the second part of a post in which Mark Thomson and Nicola McCann discuss the law and practice of harassment as applied to the media. [read post]
10 May 2010, 5:06 pm
Nicola McCann is a solicitor at Atkins Thomson. [read post]
7 May 2010, 9:56 am
Burke’s dissenting opinion in McCann v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 9:30 am
District Court for the Southern District of Illinois dismissed the case of Kremers v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
As American Needle, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 5:02 pm
In the last part of this four part post, Jonathan Coad considers the PCC from the perspective of the “person in the street”, looks at a survey of public opinion and makes recommendations for the future. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
They each raise the relevance and extent of gateway (b) in two different factual scenarios: (1) termination of a non-secure tenancy/licence occupied by virtue of section 193, Housing Act 1996 (Powell v Hounslow LBC; Manchester CC v Mushin); and (2) tenancies terminated under the introductory tenancy regime contained in Part V, Housing Act 1996 (Hall v Leeds CC; Frisby v Birmingham CC; Mullen v Salford CC). [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
They each raise the relevance and extent of gateway (b) in two different factual scenarios: (1) termination of a non-secure tenancy/licence occupied by virtue of section 193, Housing Act 1996 (Powell v Hounslow LBC; Manchester CC v Mushin); and (2) tenancies terminated under the introductory tenancy regime contained in Part V, Housing Act 1996 (Hall v Leeds CC; Frisby v Birmingham CC; Mullen v Salford CC). [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:17 am
Third, amidst the usual welter of authorities being discussed, it was particularly interesting to see the Irish cases (Donegan v Dublin CC [2008] IEHC 288; Dublin CC v Gallagher [2008] IEHC 354) being drawn on in this context, although they are a bit of a sideshow. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 1:21 pm
(Michael McCann's article in Sports Illustrated) Should athletes whose college days are long behind them be paid when the NCAA licenses their images and likenesses? [read post]
