Search for: "McCoy v. McCoy"
Results 281 - 300
of 571
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2010, 7:28 am
McCoy (09-329) and Providence Hospital v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 6:39 am
McCoy SUFFOLK COUNTYCivil Practice Court Rejects Bid for Subpoena as Labor Union Leader Privilege Ruled Inapplicable Matter of Suffolk County Ethics Commission v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 10:31 am
The plaintiffs' attorney, Waukeen McCoy, represented plaintiffs in the In re Marriage Cases, 43 Cal.4th 757 (Cal. 2008).In Strauss v. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 7:18 am
" The court also relied on McCoy in Armstrong v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:29 am
At the trial level one must prove the usual :"a plaintiff must demonstrate that the attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession' and that the attorney's breach of this duty proximately caused plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages" (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442, quoting McCoy v… [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 4:18 am
McCoy a new trial in which his lawyer is his advocate, not an ally of the prosecution. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:54 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 6:17 am
The trial court granted B of A's motion for judgment on the pleadings, and the plaintiff appealed.The Court of Appeal held: (1) As held in McCoy v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 3:00 am
Brown [v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 5:14 am
“”In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, a plaintiff must demonstrate that the attorney ‘failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession’ and that the attorney’s breach of this duty proximately caused plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages” (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442, quoting McCoy v… [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 4:31 am
. regardless of when the operative facts are discovered by the plaintiff” (Farage v Ehrenberg, 124 AD3d at 164 [citations omitted]; see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301 [2002]; Quinn v McCabe, Collins, McGeough & Fowler, LLP, 138 AD3d at 1086). [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 3:53 am
Servs., LLC v Rubin, Fiorella & Friedman, LLP, 188 AD3d 530, 531 [1st Dept 2020], quoting McCoy, 99 NY2d at 301, citing King Tower Realty Corp. v G & G Funding Corp., 163 AD3d 541 [2d Dept 2018]). [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:21 am
(See McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301 [2002).) [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:21 am
(See McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301 [2002).) [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 6:30 am
McCoy, 178 Va. 343, 349 (1941)(third persons). [read post]
16 May 2018, 4:27 am
” At Constitution Daily, Scott Bomboy reports that in McCoy v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 7:12 am
McCoy, Virginia Office for Protection and Advocacy v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 4:19 am
Garcia v Polsky, Shouldice & Rosen, P.C. [read post]
30 May 2010, 3:55 pm
McCoy, Ortho Biotech Products v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 3:10 am
By Eric Goldman 1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. [read post]
