Search for: "McGee v State"
Results 281 - 300
of 320
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2009, 1:47 pm
By Jason Johanson On Friday, March 6, 2009, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar stated that the agency is considering an appeal to the United States Supreme Court of the decision in Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Corp. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 1:47 pm
By Jason Johanson On Friday, March 6, 2009, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar stated that the agency is considering an appeal to the United States Supreme Court of the decision in Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Corp. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 7:19 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Couzens v T McGee & Co Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 95 (19 February 2009) JC (China) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWCA Civ 81 (19 February 2009) Purdy, R (on the application of) v Director of Public Prosecutions & Ors [2009] EWCA Civ 92 (19 February 2009) Bigia & Ors [...] [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:04 am
Feb. 6, 2009) ("Guinan I"), and Guinan v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 10:07 am
Mr McGee sees an infringement of freedom of press and doubts that the Bavarian state owns the copyright in the Voelkischer Beobachter. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 8:37 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 8:09 am
" United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
Kerr-McGee Chem. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 3:45 am
” State v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 11:38 am
Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Corp. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 11:38 am
Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Corp. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 2:19 pm
Kerr-McGee Oil and Gas Corp. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 4:07 pm
The district court had dismissed the case on the grounds that the auditor, who received relevant information from an employee of the State of Louisiana, was not the "original source" of the information on which the claim was based. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 9:07 am
The district court had dismissed the case on the grounds that the auditor, who received relevant information from an employee of the State of Louisiana, was not the “original source” of the information on which the claim was based. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 6:47 pm
Maxwell v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:03 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
Separately, the State of Oregon Public Health Division (ODPH) also noted a small cluster of E. coli infections that day. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 6:17 am
However, an exception to this rule is a discovery order compelling a hospital to produce credentialing files (McGee v. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 1:34 pm
The more this argument is used, the more likely it will be respected in the future by judges based upon the Rhode Island Supreme Court ruling in Waters v. [read post]
