Search for: "Merck " Results 281 - 300 of 3,323
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2015, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Patent and Trademark Office in an inter partes review by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Merck & Cie v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 2:49 pm
The AP reports, "Merck & Co. said Monday it received a letter from federal prosecutors notifying the company it is 'a target' of a grand jury investigation involving the painkiller Vioxx [rofecoxib], which Merck pulled from the market in 2004. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 7:56 am
The first trial was won by Merck, but the verdict was tossed out by the judge. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 1:23 pm
The first trial was won by Merck, but the verdict was tossed out by the judge. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 9:13 am by Tom Smith
Merck has been notably absent from America’s vaccine offensive against the virus, having seen its vaccine candidate go bust in trials earlier this year. [read post]
27 Sep 2006, 2:50 am
Merck has now won two out of three federal Vioxx cases to go to trial. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
The post Partner Eric Stern quoted, Law 360, “Merck War Exclusion Appeal Puts Focus On Policy Language,” 2-6-2023 appeared first on Kaufman Dolowich Voluck LLP. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 3:00 am by Steve Brachmann
Merck earned 224 U.S. patents during 2015, a sizable dropoff from its 2014 results. [read post]
28 Jan 2005, 1:26 pm
Merck had pulled the painkiller [Merck press release] from the market on September 30 because of its link to heart attacks and strokes. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 4:53 pm
  Steinke’s suit further alleged that Merck had approximately fifteen programs used by sales representatives to induce physicians to use Merck products. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 5:17 am by Ben Vernia
The parallel civil settlement covered a broader range of allegedly illegal conduct by Merck. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:26 pm by Mark Zamora
Merck previously disclosed the government was conducting a criminal investigation of the matter.The U.S. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 1:44 pm by Tom Lamb
Merck case and found that Merck’s updates in January 2011 to the Fosamax label regarding atypical femur fractures were adequate as a matter of law and that Merck adequately communicated those changes. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 9:10 am
A New Jersey jury found that Merck was negligent and failed to adequately warn prescribing physicians in the case of one former Vioxx user who alleged that she suffered a heart attack as a result of using the prescription painkiller.... [read post]