Search for: "Moore v. Circuit Court" Results 281 - 300 of 1,897
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2021, 9:05 am by Eugene Volokh
Plaintiffs cite the Supreme Court's recent decision in Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 6:21 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Specifically, the court concluded that the Ohio court's application of Atkins v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:15 am by Tomi Herold
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), with Chief Judge Moore writing for the court, vacated and remanded a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decision, stating the PTAB erred in construing the claims of Magseis’ U.S. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:15 am by Tomi Herold
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), with Chief Judge Moore writing for the court, vacated and remanded a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decision, stating the PTAB erred in construing the claims of Magseis’ U.S. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Slatery, (6th Cir., Aug. 5, 2021), the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld Tennessee's 48-hour waiting period for abortions. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 8:45 am by Eric Goldman
I suspect the services like the assigned judges in SD Fla, but they may prefer to have appeals go to the 9th Circuit (which has the Prager U v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 10:09 am by Edward T. Kang
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit eventually confronted the issue in Zubik v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 5:04 pm by Frank Heft
The Sixth Circuit, however, affirmed the district court’s ruling. [read post]
19 May 2021, 10:40 am by Dennis Crouch
The Federal Circuit’s decision is a classic Judge Moore opinion that identifies and defines a particular rule (here the in-fact-injury) and then strictly applies the rule to that facts at issue. [read post]
18 May 2021, 2:28 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, February 26, 2021, WICKFIRE, L.L.C. v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 4:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) Judge Pauline Newman dissented in part from a decision authored by CAFC Judge Moore yesterday, explaining that, while she agrees that New Vision Gaming’s request for vacatur and remand of two Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decisions in light of Arthrex, Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 4:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) Judge Pauline Newman dissented in part from a decision authored by CAFC Judge Moore yesterday, explaining that, while she agrees that New Vision Gaming’s request for vacatur and remand of two Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decisions in light of Arthrex, Inc. v. [read post]