Search for: "N.Y. Supreme Court" Results 281 - 300 of 3,407
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court Justices Discussed, But Did Not Agree on Code of Conduct MSN – Robert Barnes and Ann Marimow (Washington Post) | Published: 2/9/2023 Although U.S. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Addressing the Respondent's denial of access to graphic photographs of the victim of the murder pursuant to Public Officers Law §87(2)(b), the Appellate Division opined that Petitioner "failed to articulate any public interest in disclosure of these photographs which would require the court to balance the public's interest in disclosure against the victim and her family's privacy rights", citing Matter of New York Times Co. v City of N.Y. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Addressing the Respondent's denial of access to graphic photographs of the victim of the murder pursuant to Public Officers Law §87(2)(b), the Appellate Division opined that Petitioner "failed to articulate any public interest in disclosure of these photographs which would require the court to balance the public's interest in disclosure against the victim and her family's privacy rights", citing Matter of New York Times Co. v City of N.Y. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division affirmed Supreme Court's denial of the Respondent union's cross motion to vacate the arbitration award, explaining courts lacks the authority, to "examine the merits of an arbitration award and substitute its judgment for that of the arbitrator [, even if] it believes its interpretation would be the better one"*, citing Matter of United Fedn. of Teachers, Local 2, AFT, AFL—CIO v Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of… [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division affirmed Supreme Court's denial of the Respondent union's cross motion to vacate the arbitration award, explaining courts lacks the authority, to "examine the merits of an arbitration award and substitute its judgment for that of the arbitrator [, even if] it believes its interpretation would be the better one"*, citing Matter of United Fedn. of Teachers, Local 2, AFT, AFL—CIO v Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of… [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 1:28 pm by Bona Law PC
Market Power Over Locked-In Customers In the Supreme Court’s classic tying case, Kodak, the defendant required purchasers of replacement parts for its copiers to also purchase copier service from it. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 3:10 pm by Rob Robinson
District Court for the Southern District of Iowa (“Aérospatiale”), the Supreme Court addressed blocking statutes, holding that they “do not deprive an American court of the power to order a party subject to its jurisdiction to produce evidence even though the act of production may violate that statute,” and laid out a balancing test for courts to use in determining whether to order cross-border discovery.[3] (The factors in… [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 7:20 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
That's what happened here, and Supreme Court dismissed the case without any legal analysis, simply stating that it was granting the motion to dismiss for the reasons set forth in the defendant's brief. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 7:16 am by Juan C. Antúnez
So saith the 2d DCA: Our supreme court has determined that the effect of a plaintiff’s notice of voluntary dismissal “under rule 1.420(a) is jurisdictional,” Pino v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
An almost unanimous Supreme Court rejected his exclusion, in Powell v. [read post]