Search for: "NICHOLAS v. NICHOLAS"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,987
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2021, 1:27 am
In 18 June 2021, a Full bench of the Federal Court of Australia (Middleton, Nicholas, and Burley JJ) unanimously upheld a decision of a single judge of the court (Beach J), finding that a method of detecting cell-free foetal DNA (cffDNA) in maternal blood serum comprises patent-eligible subject matter (i.e. a ‘manner of manufacture’) under Australian law: Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc v Sequenom, Inc [2021] FCAFC 101. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 1:27 am
In 18 June 2021, a Full bench of the Federal Court of Australia (Middleton, Nicholas, and Burley JJ) unanimously upheld a decision of a single judge of the court (Beach J), finding that a method of detecting cell-free foetal DNA (cffDNA) in maternal blood serum comprises patent-eligible subject matter (i.e. a ‘manner of manufacture’) under Australian law: Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc v Sequenom, Inc [2021] FCAFC 101. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 7:37 am
Jane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lord Justices Lewison and Arnold and Sir Nicholas Patten) Geofabrics Ltd v Fiberweb Geosynthetics Ltd (Rev 1) [2021] EWCA Civ 854 (11 June 2021)In Geofabrics Ltd v Fiberweb Geosynthetics Ltd [2020] EWHC 444 (Pat) (5 March 2020) which I discussed in Patents - Geofabrics Ltd v Fiberweb Geosynthetics Ltd. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 10:21 am
The Next Major Challenge to the Affordable Care Act By Nicholas Bagley, Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law School Nicholas Bagley discusses Kelley v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 11:16 am
Broyde (Emory), Nicholas Johnson (Fordham), Thomas E. [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 1:29 pm
Kurup discussed the Supreme Court’s decision to hear United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 11:03 am
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Orin Kerr explained what the Supreme Court’s decision in Van Buren v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 7:33 am
Author Addicted04 Licence CC BY-SA 3.0 Source Wikimedia CommonsJane LambertPatents Court (Nicholas Caddick QC) GK IP Bridge 1 v Huawei Technologies Co Ltd. and others 2021] EWHC 1261 (Pat) (14 May 2021)This was an application by two Chinese companies, Huawei Technologies Co. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 9:41 pm
(Not entirely on point, but it reminds me of my favorite political satire case, New Times, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 4:00 am
Paul’s Foundation and Shrine of Saint Nicholas the Wonder Worker, Patron of Sailors, Brewers and Repentant Thieves v. [read post]
12 May 2021, 8:08 pm
The case involves a claim of excessive police force, brought by the parents of Nicholas Gilbert, who died while in police custody. [read post]
9 May 2021, 4:07 pm
N° 94275, Nicholas Economides, New York University – Leonard N. [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
Nicholas Orago; Prof. [read post]
5 May 2021, 4:00 am
Jones v Stooshinoff (Nicholas J. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 11:59 am
Village of Islandia v Commissioner Richard A. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 4:44 pm
” In 1961, Monroe v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 12:49 pm
The Supreme Court granted certiorari today in Hemphill v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 9:04 am
The justices once again did not act on Dobbs v. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 5:51 am
Llewellyn, Fenwick & West LLP, on Sunday, April 11, 2021 Tags: Board composition, Boards of Directors, California, Diversity, ESG, Human capital, Management, Tech companies Supreme Court to Weigh in on Presumption of Reliance in Securities Class Actions: Goldman Sachs v. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm
A few weeks back, in Meriwether v. [read post]
