Search for: "NO PARTY V. NO PARTY" Results 281 - 300 of 119,767
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Court of Appeals Rules that Order of Civil Contempt Cannot Be Based Solely on Failure to Pay Award of Attorney’s Fees and Costs
11 Jun 2024, 1:33 pm by Douglas C. Melcher
On April 11, 2024, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decided Kayode v. [read post]
D.C. Law Blog - https://melcherlaw.com/dc-law-blog
Chancery Rejects Breach of Fiduciary Duty As Basis to Toll Statute of Limitations
11 Jun 2024, 11:15 am by Francis Pileggi
In ETC Northeast Field Services, LLC v. [read post]
Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog - http://www.delawarelitigation.com/
Is a free trial version "commercial speech"?
11 Jun 2024, 10:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
USA LLC v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
Meme Law Alert! Meme Use In Political Ad Isn’t Fair Use–Griner v. King
11 Jun 2024, 6:41 am by Eric Goldman
Case Citation: Griner v. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
Demurrer Asserted by Officers/Agents of Corporate Defendants Denied in Premises Liability Action
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of Bell v. [read post]
Tort Talk - http://www.torttalk.com/
Plaintiff's claim that the termination her employment violated Labor Law §201-d(2)(c), which bars an employer from discharging an employee because of the employee's legal recreational activities outside work hours, rejected
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In light of the foregoing, we do not reach the parties' remaining contentions. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
Plaintiff's claim that the termination her employment violated Labor Law §201-d(2)(c), which bars an employer from discharging an employee because of the employee's legal recreational activities outside work hours, rejected
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In light of the foregoing, we do not reach the parties' remaining contentions. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
Precedential No. 11: TTAB Upholds 2(a) False Connection Refusal of LEATHERNECKS for Motorcycle Club Membership
11 Jun 2024, 3:31 am
Jackson Int’l Trading, 2012 TTAB LEXIS 246, at *6; Hornby v. [read post]
The TTABlog - http://thettablog.blogspot.com/
First District Court of Appeal Holds Completion of Project Does Not Render CEQA Violation Claims Moot So Long as Effectual Mitigation Measures Remain Available
11 Jun 2024, 2:00 am by Diane G. Kindermann, J. Gage Marchini, Jack Sandage and Abbott & Kindermann, Inc.
Vichy Springs Resort, Inc. v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
[Guest post] Bad faith or business-savvy? Lessons from recent EU General Court’s ruling
11 Jun 2024, 1:42 am by Eleonora Rosati
Naturally, the Board of Appeal could refer to them without consulting the parties. [read post]
IPKat - http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/
COULDN’T BRING THE SAME CASE AGAIN
10 Jun 2024, 11:00 pm
# # #DECISIONC. v City of New York [read post]
Real Estate Law Blog - http://www.nyrealestatelawblog.com/
Supreme Court Agrees to Take Up Facebook User Data Disclosure Case
10 Jun 2024, 3:53 pm by Kevin LaCroix
A copy of the Court’s June 10, 2024, order in Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
The D & O Diary - http://www.dandodiary.com/
Construction Worker’s Claims Upheld at Trial and Substantial Damages Awarded but Retrial Ordered on Collateral Issues
10 Jun 2024, 1:14 pm by John Hochfelder
The trial judge agreed with the defendant’s position as did the appellate court in Malecaj v. [read post]
New York Injury Cases Blog - http://www.newyorkinjurycasesblog.com/
The Supreme Court and social media: Can government officials block online comments?
10 Jun 2024, 11:28 am by Scott Bomboy
In very limited circumstances, private parties are considered state actors. [read post]
Constitution Daily - https://constitutioncenter.org/blog
Interpreting the Printed Matter Doctrine in Inter Partes Review
10 Jun 2024, 11:28 am by Joshua Weisenfeld
In Ioengine, LLC v. [read post]
Intellectual Property Law Blog - http://www.intellectualpropertylawblog.com/
"#1 Brand" claim was literally false because of apples-to-oranges comparison
10 Jun 2024, 9:39 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Zesty Paws LLC v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
Supreme Court Holds Legislature’s Case-Driven CEQA Amendments Require Judgment Upholding UC Berkeley’s 2021 Long-Range Development Plan EIR and People’s Park Housing Project Against Claims of Failures to Analyze Student “Social Noise” and Alternative Locations
10 Jun 2024, 8:37 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Make UC A Good Neighbor v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Justices to review Meta investors’ data-harvesting suit and Medicare payments calculation
10 Jun 2024, 8:07 am by Amy Howe
Sunoco v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
The Supreme Court Just Gave Us Hope ⋆ Brownstone Institute
10 Jun 2024, 7:57 am by Tom Smith
Biden and Murthy v. [read post]
The Right Coast - https://rightcoast.typepad.com/rightcoast/
The Appellate Division, Third Department notrs that "the scope of this Court's review of a condemnor's EDPL 204 determination is limited to whether (1) the proceeding was constitutionally sound; (2) the condemnor had the requisite authority; (3) its determination complied with SEQRA and EDPL Article 2; and (4) the acquisition will serve a public use"
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The party challenging the condemnation bears the burden of establishing that the determination was without foundation and baseless, or that it was violative of the applicable statutory criteria" (Matter of PSC, LLC v City of Albany Indus. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/