Search for: "NORRIS v. STATE" Results 281 - 300 of 355
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2016, 2:11 pm by familoo
We have seen the Northern Irish Supreme Court Justice Lord Kerr suggesting that Article 3 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child ought to be directly applicable, and the Supreme Court applying it in Mathieson v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 47 (8 July 2015). [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
The report, a first of its kind, found that existing surveillance law is being eroded by six factors: the introduction of new laws that expand state surveillance powers; lack of legal precision and privacy safeguards in existing surveillance legislation; increased supply of new surveillance technologies that enable illegitimate surveillance; state agencies regularly conducting surveillance outside of what is permitted in law; impunity for those committing illegitimate acts of… [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 7:02 am
The Nebraska Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide contains a list of State resources compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
On 15 February 2019 Norris J handed down judgment in the case of Winstone v MGN [2019] EWHC 265 (Ch) [pdf]  He held that MGN was not entitled to claim privilege in respect of comments made by the Chairman of Trinity Mirror after an AGM. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 2:27 am by Fiona de Londras
This is something we are all too familiar with in Ireland, where we have failed to take action in response to cases against other states when our own law is clearly analogous to the one impugned: one need only think of Norris v Ireland for an example from our past and the persistent operation of s. 62 of the Housing Act 1966 in light of cases such as Connors, McCann and Kay for what looks certain to be a repeat performance in the future unless some legislative change is… [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:42 am
This is something we are all too familiar with in Ireland, where we have failed to take action in response to cases against other states when our own law is clearly analogous to the one impugned: one need only think of Norris v Ireland (ECHR 1988) for an example from our past. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:30 am by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions In Norris v Gittos [2011] WASC 295 the Supreme Court of Western Australia gave reasons for striking out the plaintiff’s claim for defamation, having found that the defendant had “impregnable defences”. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:31 am
Judge Purdy respectfully endorsed the 'very powerful observations' of Lord Phillips, President of the Supreme Court, in Norris v USA [2010] UKSC 9, who disapproved of general considerations but accepted the exceptional circumstances in which Article 8 would lead to a discharge of an otherwise perfectly proper extradition request. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-309). [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 2:23 am by INFORRM
United States A federal judge has dismissed a defamation lawsuit filed by former President Donald Trump against CNN. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 9:52 am by Eric Goldman
The threats are everywhere: Congress, state legislatures, the Supreme Court, internationally. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 8:50 am by Eric Goldman
I’ve written this in preparation for the Supreme Court appeal in NetChoice v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 5:57 am by Colin Murray
Of course, the criminalisation of homosexuality was discussed in Parliament in the same era and that didn’t stop the UK and Ireland from having to revisit that issue at the behest of Strasbourg decisions in Dudgeon v UK and Norris v Ireland. [read post]