Search for: "National Federation of Federal Employees v. United States" Results 281 - 300 of 3,011
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2013, 11:20 am by Lyle Denniston
  The new case denied Tuesday was United Airlines v. [read post]
31 Mar 2025, 1:27 pm
” The victims also point to the Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in Mallory v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 6:43 am by Ravi S. Nagi
On May 21, 2018, the United States Supreme Court ruled that employers may require employees to enter arbitration agreements that waive their rights to seek class-action claims against the employer. [read post]
23 May 2018, 7:03 am by Jennifer Parent
Photo: Beatrice Murch via Flickr (CC by 2.0)In a 5-4 decision, the United States Supreme Court has held that employers may enforce arbitration agreements signed by employees that bar class-action lawsuits and require individualized arbitration. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In this appeal the United States Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, considered the employee's [Plaintiff] challenge to a federal district court's summarily dismissing his Title VII  complaint  "in the entirety" on the motion of his former employer [Defendant] and the lower court's dismissal of his New York City Human Rights Law"* allegations. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In this appeal the United States Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, considered the employee's [Plaintiff] challenge to a federal district court's summarily dismissing his Title VII  complaint  "in the entirety" on the motion of his former employer [Defendant] and the lower court's dismissal of his New York City Human Rights Law"* allegations. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:50 pm
Initially, the United States District Court for the Western District of New York dismissed Ms. [read post]
While some federal district courts have indicated that an employee may state a claim under Title VII based on sexual orientation discrimination, no federal court of appeals has held that Title VII covers an employee’s sexual orientation. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:23 pm by Gene Quinn
This trend was halted by the United States Supreme Court in the summer of 2002 in Holmes Group, Inc. v. [read post]