Search for: "New York v. Class" Results 281 - 300 of 6,645
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
What should social studies and history classes involve, now that a number of states seek to or already forbid teaching that “leads any individual should feel discomfort, guilt, anguish or any other form of psychological distress” on any issue related to race? [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 5:53 am by Kevin LaCroix
As discussed here, in July 2021, a plaintiff shareholder filed a securities class action lawsuit in the Southern District of New York against CarLotz and certain of its officers. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 6:23 am by Mayela Celis
This week a conference took place to honor Professor Linda Silberman at New York University (NYU). [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Each count asserts a violation of a New York statute that defines a class E felony. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 11:44 am by Kaylee A. Sill (US)
The post The New York Times Company Secures Registration of Six Column Names, Including LIKE A BOSS and THE NEW OLD AGE appeared first on The Brand Protection Blog. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 11:44 am by Kaylee A. Sill (US)
The post The New York Times Company Secures Registration of Six Column Names, Including LIKE A BOSS and THE NEW OLD AGE appeared first on The Brand Protection Blog. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 9:27 am by Eugene Volokh
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 8:48 am by Evan Schwartz
The insured argued that the replacement cost should also include nearly $700 million in additional expenses that would be necessary in order to adapt the new structure’s design to the “changed legal, physical, and political environment of post-9/11 New York. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 3:42 am
In re The New York Times Company, Serial Nos. 90106071, 90112154, 90112577, 90115155, 90115491, and 90115337 (March 30, 2023) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Angela Lykos). [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 6:18 am by Unknown
By John Filar AtwoodA judge in the Southern District of New York has dismissed, with leave to amend, 1934 Act Section 16(b) claims against multiple defendants on the grounds that the plaintiff did not plausibly allege that the defendants constituted a “group” subject to Section 16(b) liability. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Since then, district courts in the Southern District of New York have evaluated scheme liability under Rio Tinto, but there have been no further opinions discussing the scope of Lorenzo in the other circuits. [read post]