Search for: "New City, Inc." Results 281 - 300 of 9,981
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2023, 11:28 am by admin
Back in 1997, Francis Douglas Kelly Liddell, a real scientist in the area of asbestos and disease, had had enough of the insinuations, slanders, and bad science from the minions of Irving John Selikoff.[1] Liddell broke with the norms of science and called out his detractors for what they were doing:  “[A]n anti-asbestos lobby, based in the Mount Sinai School of Medicine of the City University of New York, promoted the fiction that asbestos was an… [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the claim against defendant City University of New York [CUNY] because any claims of misconduct by CUNY's counsel with respect to the selection of the arbitrator must be brought in the Court of Claims; 2. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the claim against defendant City University of New York [CUNY] because any claims of misconduct by CUNY's counsel with respect to the selection of the arbitrator must be brought in the Court of Claims; 2. [read post]
Paramount Pictures, Inc., the Supreme Court was concerned about the exhibition tactics being taken by these major studios. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 11:11 am by Patricia Salkin
  Discovery Builders, Inc. v City of Oakland, 2023 WL 4115074 (CA App. 6/22/2023). [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:00 pm by John Ross
City: We don't want to spark that particular conversation, so no thank you. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 11:39 am by Rachel Casper
While obtaining her LLM in Intellectual Property from Cardozo School of Law and starting a new career path as Counsel for BBC Studios Americas, Inc., Donya put her Aquarius characteristics under a sharper light. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court's rejection of Defendants' [City Respondents] motion to dismiss Plaintiff's causes of action alleging discrimination and retaliation under the New York City Human Rights Law [City HRL] and New York State Human Rights Law [State HRL]; her aiding and abetting claims; and her claims under the Gender-Motivated Violence Act [GMVA]* was unanimously affirmed by the Appellate Division, without costs. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court's rejection of Defendants' [City Respondents] motion to dismiss Plaintiff's causes of action alleging discrimination and retaliation under the New York City Human Rights Law [City HRL] and New York State Human Rights Law [State HRL]; her aiding and abetting claims; and her claims under the Gender-Motivated Violence Act [GMVA]* was unanimously affirmed by the Appellate Division, without costs. [read post]