Search for: "Newhouse "
Results 281 - 300
of 789
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2008, 12:22 am
Yet another California trial judge has issued a blatantly unconstitutional prior restraint to protect a defendant's pretrial rights, reports the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 2:28 am
Is a quickie profile better than none at all? [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 2:16 am
I'm debating whether this James Risen story reveals a plot that's more Lewis Carroll or George Orwell: The FISA court issues its third public opinion in its entire history of nearly three decades. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 4:46 pm
Brendan McCarthy, the New Orleans Times-Picayune cops reporter who wrote the "Homicide 37" series that I raved about, gives some peeks behind the scenes of the project in this Q&A with CJR's Katia Bachko. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 12:14 pm
One of journalism's leading constitutional experts (self-taught category) has weighed in on the emergency financial bailout plan with this fascinating analysis of the role that the courts might play in any legal challenge. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 4:59 am
Miller-McCune editor John Mecklin clued me in to the latest rage inside the geek branch of investigative reporting: "computational journalism. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 6:09 am
Warren Richey provides the second of three parts of a Christian Science Monitor series on "The Bush Legacy," this time focusing on the president's war-on-terror legal policies, particularly his -- or, rather, Vice President Cheney's -- efforts to enhance presidential power (the series' first part, yesterday, was a more general look at history's likely judgment, while tomorrow's looks at foreign policy). [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 3:59 am
I overlooked this story on Sunday, but thanks to Slate's Jack Shafer, I've found in it a valuable lesson about scare stories based on bogus statistics. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 8:43 am
The legal-gossip blogger whose name I do not speak has turned his beady gaze upon NPR's Nina Totenberg. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 7:56 pm
For eight months I've been razzing The New York Times for not immediately naming a replacement on the legal affairs beat for Adam Liptak, once Liptak moved to the Supreme Court beat. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 12:58 am
Lisa Sandberg's Houston Chronicle story today sticks up for a politically dicey group: registered sex offenders who say their sex with minors wasn't all that bad. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 4:26 am
This article in today's Washington Post Outlook section should be required reading for every legal reporter and journalism student. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 4:26 am
Jack Shafer struts his Lexis-Nexis abilities in this critique on the overuse of the word "loophole. [read post]
6 Oct 2007, 3:53 am
As Durham-in-Wonderland heads over the horizon, let's take the opportunity to ponder what its existence meant to legal reporting.When Brooklyn College professor KC Johnson started blogging about the Duke case, he did what few bother to try: original reporting. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 1:47 pm
While the backlash from the housing-bubble burst has focused on Wall Street finances, the Miami Herald's "Borrowers Betrayed" investigation shows that the problems also involve crimes of a lower sort. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 4:31 am
Just-discovered resource: Mark Grabowski, a Marist College journalism prof and law grad, has an extensive journalism-careers site, Cubreporters.org, where he includes a list of opportunities at the intersection of law and journalism -- in legal reporting, and in media law. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 4:59 am
Here's a wonderful example of a local newspaper's commitment to public access to court records. [read post]
20 Oct 2007, 4:47 am
Darryl Fears' front-pager does a good job of examining the sociology of the noose and the history of lynchings. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 1:07 am
We're hearing a lot these days about evil, biased "mainstream media" who are best bypassed so that newsmakers can speak directly to the public. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 1:14 pm
Journalists covering Congress' passage of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act have "thoroughly distorted the facts" in that policy debate, continuing a pattern that began with "an explosion of ill-informed media outrage" after Ledbetter's Supreme Court loss in 2007. [read post]
