Search for: "Nichols v. State" Results 281 - 300 of 557
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2008, 7:14 pm
  The case is People v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 10:47 am
In holding this to unpatentable, Nicholls LJ stated at 327 that “his program makes a more efficient use of a computer's resources. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 1:10 am by Matthew Hill
It noted that the problem of deciding the Court’s temporal jurisdiction had been considered with varying results in previous cases, notably Blecic v Croatia (2006) 43 E.H.R.R. 48, Moldovan v Romania (2007) 44 E.H.R.R. 16, Balasoiu v Romania (App. no. 37424/97), 2 September 2003, and Kholodova v Russia (App. no. 30651/05), 14 September 2006. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 7:00 am by Lisa
The media frenzy so tainted the case that the United States Supreme Court released him and ordered a 1966 retrial in the case Sheppard v. [read post]
21 Sep 2006, 9:51 am
In Nichols Institute Diagnostics v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:10 am by Francis Davey
Unsurprisingly, in my view, in the light of Lord Justice Nichols famous dictum in Lloyds Bank Plc v Rosset [1989] 1 Ch 350 (a case with many similar features): "There was, I repeat, physical presence on the property by the wife and her agent of the nature, and to the extent, that one would expect of an occupier having regard to the then state of the property: namely, the presence involved in actually carrying out the renovation necessary to make the house fit for… [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 10:13 am
I have been following with interest the software patent case of Symbian v Comptroller General for Patents. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:10 am by Francis Davey
Unsurprisingly, in my view, in the light of Lord Justice Nichols famous dictum in Lloyds Bank Plc v Rosset [1989] 1 Ch 350 (a case with many similar features): "There was, I repeat, physical presence on the property by the wife and her agent of the nature, and to the extent, that one would expect of an occupier having regard to the then state of the property: namely, the presence involved in actually carrying out the renovation necessary to make the house fit for… [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 12:22 pm by Michael Baseluos
The seminal case that has driven the enactment of dram shop liability laws was a NJ case called Rappaport v. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 12:22 pm by Michael Baseluos
The seminal case that has driven the enactment of dram shop liability laws was a NJ case called Rappaport v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 8:53 am
The great Judge Learned Hand established the standard for character protection in Nichols v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:27 am
Hinnant, and Michael Nichols [hereinafter collectively referred to as Bey] are former tenured New York City Correction Department officers.Identifying themselves as "Black and of Moorish national origin,” and believing that they were exempt from federal and state taxes, they filed Federal and New York State tax forms claiming exemptions from income tax withholdings. [read post]