Search for: "Norris v. Norris" Results 281 - 300 of 557
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2016, 6:30 am by David Whitehead
The recent judgment of the Supreme Court in R v Jogee; Ruddock v The Queen (Jamaica) [2016] UKSC 8 was remarkable not only in that it overruled more than thirty years of case law, but also in that it concerned a controversial area of criminal law about which there was a great deal of public interest. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 7:19 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
Norris, 16 U.S.C.M.A. 574, 37 C.M.R. 194 (to be admissible, must be verbatim); United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 5:36 am by INFORRM
However, I welcome Senator Norris’s initiative as it is helpful to debate the issue. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 4:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“The plaintiff commenced this action, inter alia, to recover damages for legal malpractice against the defendants Kaufman & Kahn, LLP (hereinafter Kaufman), and Fiden & Norris, LLP (hereinafter Fiden; hereinafter together the defendants), firms that represented the plaintiff’s adversaries in a prior action. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 7:46 am by Nabiha Syed
At Time, Adam Cohen takes a look at Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 9:00 pm
In Servier v Apotex [2012] EWCA Civ 593 the EWCA held that comity requires that English courts should not reward a litigant for acts that infringe foreign patents. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
Mr Justice Norris held the following: the directors had honestly believed that, at the time when the acquisition of the land was completed, it was in the company's best interests to go through with the transaction. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 11:40 pm by Josh Blackman
I've now had a chance to review the oral argument in the Students for Fair Admission v. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 12:35 pm by Josh Blackman
This decision was made in the shadow of Students for Fair Admission v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 8:59 pm
In a decision dated September 11, 2009, available on Westlaw but lamentably not on the free Web, in a habeas corpus case called Norris v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 6:43 am by Shams Hirji
Judge Norris used the parenthetical in a unanimous, unpublished opinion for a panel of the Sixth Circuit consisting of himself, Judge Moore, and Judge Stranch in United States v. [read post]