Search for: "North Carolina v. Tennessee" Results 281 - 300 of 427
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2018, 2:11 pm by Kevin
To the shame of Arkansas, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Texas, they still haven’t gotten rid of theirs entirely (even though it’s very unlikely the requirement could be enforced). [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:59 am by John Elwood
North Carolina, 12-10958. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 8:11 am by Jeffrey Mitchell
The October BroadbandUSA Newsletter includes notable state broadband news items from Colorado, Idaho, Kentucky, North Carolina, among others. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 7:43 am by John Elwood
Tennessee — concerning the constitutionality of victim impact statements — implicitly overruled Booth v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 3:19 pm
North Dakota: removed restrictions on carry in public parks, stores that sell liquor, and public highway rest areas. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 8:00 am by Kent Scheidegger
North Carolina, 428 U.S. 280 (1976), but the statutes that allowed consideration of mitigating circumstances were constitutional. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 12:42 pm by News Desk
The recalled products were distributed in the following states: Arkansas, Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Nevada, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Wisconsin. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm by John Ehrett
§ 2254(d)(1) when it granted habeas relief on the ground that the North Carolina state courts unreasonably applied "clearly established" law when they held that third-party religious discussions with jurors did not concern "the matter[s] pending before the jury. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 7:42 am
Tennessee Valley Auth., No. 06-2131 In common-law nuisance action contending coal plants emit various pollutants which travel through the atmosphere into North Carolina, adversely impacting human health and environmental quality, denial of defendant authority's motion to dismiss is affirmed over claims that the suit is barred by: 1) the discretionary function doctrine; 2) the Supremacy Clause; and 3) the holding of Ferris v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 1:42 pm
        Ken Shigley is on the Association of Interstate Trucking Lawyers of America National Advisory Board, is a frequent national seminar speaker for the Interstate Trucking Litigation Group of the American Association for Justice, and served as chair of the Southeastern Motor Carrier Litigation Institute, co-sponsored by the Georgia, Alabama, Tennessee and North Carolina Trial Lawyers Associations. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 7:02 am by Ana Popovich
(FirstChoice), Labsource LLC (Labsource), Pain Management Associates of the Carolinas LLC (PMA of the Carolinas) and Pain Management Associates of North Carolina P.C. [read post]