Search for: "O’CONNOR V. STATE"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,814
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2010, 12:44 pm
(written by Chief Judge Kozinski, and joined by retired Justice O’Connor, sitting by designation, and Judge Sandra Ikuta). [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 12:00 am
O'Connor at (518) 426-7700. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:31 am
Plaintiffs’ Complaint Isn’t Ohio a notice pleading state, asked Justice O’Neill? [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 9:30 am
In State v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 7:37 am
Chief Justice O’Connor and Justice Kennedy joined the majority opinion in full. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:41 am
Even assuming that Defendants Thompson and Simone advised or encouraged O'Connor to terminate Plaintiff, there is no evidence of racial animus or bias on behalf of O'Connor, Thompson or Simone against Plaintiff. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 7:03 am
”) State v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 6:37 am
The state’s reliance on Lewis v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 11:00 am
Supreme Court Merit Decision In a unanimous decision written by Chief Justice O’Connor, the Court emphatically rejected the state’s contention that an earlier arrest warrant cleanses a bad detention. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 7:45 am
With Justices O’Connor and David Souter, he played a pivotal role in the preservation of Roe v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 12:33 am
” Soon after, the woman filed a sexual harassment claim, O’Connor v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 12:33 am
” Soon after, the woman filed a sexual harassment claim, O’Connor v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 12:33 am
” Soon after, the woman filed a sexual harassment claim, O’Connor v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:03 am
(O’Connor’s biographer, Evan Thomas, confirms what others have long suspected: that she was the one who insisted that Justice Anthony Kennedy add this cabining sentence to the opinion that he otherwise drafted.) [read post]
21 Jun 2006, 6:48 am
State v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 8:15 am
Parker (1954), a longstanding precedent that O’Connor’s opinion would have allowed to stand. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 6:45 am
No: Chief Justice O’Connor and Justices O’Donnell, and Kennedy. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 4:58 am
State v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 11:38 am
Votes to Accept the Case: Yes: Chief Justices O’Connor and Justices Lanzinger, O’Neill, and French. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 4:58 pm
Now I said above that there was a possible caveat, and the caveat is this: The two parties in Quon both agree that Quon’s rights are governed by the government workplace rules of O’Connor v. [read post]
