Search for: "Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Grant "
Results 281 - 300
of 344
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2011, 9:26 am
Proprietary, commercial or financial information, balance sheets, trade secrets, and revenue and cost projections provided by a private transportation business to the Virginia Department of Transportation and the Department of Rail and Public Transportation for the purpose of conducting transportation studies needed to obtain grants or other financial assistance under the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (P.L. 105-178) for transportation projects, provided such information is… [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 4:05 am
Accordingly, said the court, the hearing officer’s decision to go forward with the disciplinary hearing in Toolasprashad's absence was arbitrary and capricious.The Mari decision [Mari v Safir, 291 AD2d 298, motion for leave to appeal denied, 98 NY2d 613] sets out the general standards applied by the courts in resolving litigation resulting from conducting a disciplinary hearing in absentia.The decision demonstrates that an individual against whom… [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:09 pm
King, who pled guilty to federal mail fraud, challenged the subsequent disbarment recommendation, arguing that the proceedings against him were unfair, that disciplinary counsel should have been disqualified, that the hearing officer failed to follow hearing rules with regard to settlement of the hearing transcript, and that Mr. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 3:55 am
Claiming he was suffering from stress and emotional problems, Campbell requested and was granted multiple medical leaves. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 6:47 pm
” Comm. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 6:19 am
International Dairy Foods Association v. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:54 am
Ultimately the Court of Appeals considered the matter in terms of a court's authority to overturn or modify an administrative disciplinary decision or a disciplinary penalty imposed on a worker [Kelly v Safir, 96 N.Y.2d 32].The Court of Appeals, ruled:1. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 4:10 am
”The court noted that, as Titone’s Counsel “adeptly points out that, rather than investigating the fact that rescue equipment was in need of repair, they rushed to punish [Titone] for abiding by his oath to protect and serve the public. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
NanceDocket: 09-1115Issue(s): (1) Whether a police officer may be held liable on a claim under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 4:39 am
Vaxxion v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 7:39 pm
LEXIS 18970 (5th Cir 9/9/2010) (dissent) Relief denied, on materiality grounds, relating to a Brady claim where one “of the officers who had testified at his trial, Jaime Escalante, had a disciplinary record and was romantically involved with the sister of the lone eyewitness, Reynaldo Munoz. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:01 am
The court in Katz relied on Bell v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 8:19 am
The suit began in October of 2000, and ECUSA was named as a defendant.The next triennial budget was adopted at General Convention 2003, which saw the confirmation of the election of V. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 8:49 pm
State v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
Citing Stump v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:39 am
Nabors’ counsel requested the hearing be adjourned to a later date. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:22 am
Then the Town's attorney requested an adjournment of the hearing, and the hearing officer granted the request by rescheduling the hearing for May 18, 2006.The hearing officer again adjourned the hearing, this time until July 5, 2006 and ultimately the hearing was conducted on July 5, 2006, and July 28, 2006.The hearing officer issued a decision and order dated January 4, 2007, finding Nabors was guilty of all three charges. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 8:53 pm
LEXIS 975 (Ohio App 9th 3/24/2010) Postconviction relief denied on appeal on issues relating to failure to permit discovery, funding experts, ineffective assistance of counsel (trial court chose wrong standard to examine claims, failure to investigate and present, use of experts (cultural, DNA & neurological), as well as “lead counsel’s substance abuse, disciplinary investigation, and, ultimately, his arrest”) Ruben Gutierrez v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 12:45 pm
” (Burlington Industries, v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 7:12 am
The Scope of Workplace Privacy Rights In Hernandez v. [read post]
