Search for: "Officer John Doe 3"
Results 281 - 300
of 6,955
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2023, 3:51 am
” Chewy’s Vice President rejected the proposal because, as the warehouse safety officer would later explain, “the feeling was that if we lowered the load beams . . . , that that would somehow affect the [storage] capacity that we had. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
He does not. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 1:00 am
The Revd TERENCE JOHN GORDON LOWDiocese: ChelmsfordDate imposed: 1 June 2023Relevant CDM section: 16(3A)Statutory Ground of Misconduct: s.8(1)(d): Conduct unbecoming & inappropriate to the office and work of a clerk in Holy OrdersPenalty: prohibition for 10 years with effect from 1 June 2023 The Revd RUPERT EVANS Diocese: SouthwarkDate imposed: 5 June 2023Relevant CDM section: 30(1)(a)Statutory Ground [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:06 pm
Mar. 3, 2022); Doe v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:31 am
Our constitutional history does not tolerate that choice. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 1:46 am
Asa Fitch, Yuka Hayashi, and John D. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
It had the look and feel of the kind of election we are all familiar with for federal, provincial, or municipal office. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:41 am
Then the police officers would go out and arrest the marks. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm
The theory itself isn't the basis for the Roy Cohn/Louis XIV (l'état, c'est moi) view of executive power.(3) HypocrisyDespite its problematic framing, the Times story does point to the fundamental hypocrisy of the Trumpists: "They are condemning Mr. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 7:57 am
It is possible to have a society that does not have fair trials: Ancient societies, and modern dictatorships all exist without them. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 2:02 pm
"I think it's a very savvy move not bringing that charge," said John P. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 4:32 pm
” According to TIGTA, the IRS Whistleblower Office does not collect enough data to be able to track what factors make a whistleblower claim more effective than others. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 5:50 am
Moritz, decided Mar. 31 by the Nebraska Supreme Court (in an opinion by Justice John Freudenberg, joined by Chief Justice Michael Heavican and Justices Stephanie Stacy and Jonathan Papik): At issue in this appeal is whether social media posts directed toward local public figures from a public account of an officer of a local bank constituted misconduct in connection with work disqualifying the employee from unemployment benefits. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:45 pm
Foresight Coal Sales, LLC 22-1083Issues: (1) Whether a state law discriminates against interstate commerce in practical effect when there has been no showing of any burden on interstate commerce beyond a de minimis one; (2) whether a discriminates against interstate commerce when it only offsets a state-imposed disadvantage, does so equally for all states imposing that disadvantage, and does not affect any out-of-state business’ earned or natural advantage; and (3)… [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:30 am
That does not dilute David’s main point about the effects of judicial intervention, but it does tell us something about the extent to which we can rely on courts to strike the balance that David sees as the objective of federal actors generally. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 3:30 am
John blogged about that case last year when it was issued. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
After issuing a memorandum on “Modernizing Regulatory Review” on his first day in office in 2021, President Biden issued an executive order (EO) on April 6, 2023, calling for further steps by federal regulatory agencies and the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) within the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
According to respondent, the directive only applied to Department-authorized “carry” or “recreational” handguns (Id. at 2-3). [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
According to respondent, the directive only applied to Department-authorized “carry” or “recreational” handguns (Id. at 2-3). [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
Judge Richard Sueyoshi determined the law, which went into effect in January, does not violate either the state or federal constitutions. [read post]
