Search for: "Others unknown to Plaintiff" Results 281 - 300 of 2,351
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2015, 4:02 am
Late last year this Kat got to hear about an organisation which, if not exactly clandestine, was certainly unknown to him. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 8:30 am by emagraken
Although it is unknown whether that impact actually contributed to the plaintiff’s shoulder and arm injuries, there certainly was a foreseeable risk of injury in yanking the plaintiff through a partly open truck door. [134]              There was also a foreseeable and unnecessary risk of injury with a 6’ 3”, 240 lb officer taking a person to the ground with a leg sweep trip while… [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 2:26 pm by John C. Manoog III
Although the defendant did have a legally cognizable duty to prevent harm to its own minor patients, that duty did not require it to protect potential future plaintiffs in other states. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 7:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Oct. 1, 2015) Plaintiff NJ PURE sued Boynton, who added third-party defendants Joanna Elias and Eric Poe. [read post]
14 May 2023, 7:07 pm
Yu became aware that ByteDance had for years engaged in a worldwide scheme to steal and profit from the copyrighted works of others. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 1:19 pm
That bodes well for the other claims that are pending against this pharmaceutical company. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 8:26 am
What we have, in other words, is a "known unknown. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 7:34 am
Half were told that the plaintiff offered to settle for $100,000, and the other half learned of a $10 million settlement offer. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 10:35 am by charley foster
"[The Order states that] a "general intent to violate a statute at some unknown date in the future does not rise to the level of an articulated, concrete plan. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 4:49 am by John Day
  Plaintiff initially filed suit on June 26, 2008 and later, and for unknown reasons, non-suited that action in November of 2009. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 5:11 pm by John A. Gallagher
” If the Court blindly approved the waiver of “any and all Claims” “concerning the termination of Plaintiff’s employment,” the Court risks judicially endorsing a waiver of Plaintiff’s other statutorily protected rights that may be implicated by an allegedly unlawful termination…And such judicial endorsement exceeds the court’s judicial approval role under the FLSA. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 4:29 pm by kgates
The amount in controversy is unknown at this time, so the second factor weighs in favor of Folino, who avers that unknown damages cannot justify exorbitant discovery requests. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 4:29 pm by kgates
The amount in controversy is unknown at this time, so the second factor weighs in favor of Folino, who avers that unknown damages cannot justify exorbitant discovery requests. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 2:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
With this in mind, the Court finds that Plaintiff's deposition testimony is insufficient to satisfy Defendants' prima facie burden based upon the "unknown cause" caselaw. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 12:54 pm
  All of the authorities relied on by the plaintiff came to the conclusion, in some fashion unknown to me, certainly not discernable from the reasons, that the timing would lead to an adjournment and that an adjournment would prejudice the plaintiff. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 12:20 pm by Jason Byrne
  After analyzing similar cases, the Court found that under these unique circumstances, where there was evidence that the accident site was not accessible to pedestrians or other non-vehicular traffic, a jury could find a substantial physical nexus between a hit-and-run vehicle and the ladder struck by the plaintiff. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 2:36 am by Marty Lederman
  As I’ll discuss in my next post, neither the HHS Rule nor any other federal law requires employers to offer a health-care plan to their employees. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:53 pm by Matthew Parham
 Having given the Bank nothing it could use, the Bank called its putative document custodian as its only other witness. [read post]