Search for: "Owings v. Foote"
Results 281 - 300
of 315
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2010, 6:51 am
The reimbursement rights of the VA are written into law and are set out in the 1990 case, United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 1:52 pm
Delaware Chancellor Allen's decision in Mendel v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am
In Greene v Associated Newspapers Ltd ([2004] EWCA Civ 1462) it withstood a challenge mounted on the footing that sections 6 and 12 HRA taken together required a judge considering an application for an interim injunction in a defamation case to ask himself whether the claimant was ‘more likely than not’ to be able to establish at trial that publication should not be allowed (that is, to ask himself the question the HRA would require him to ask if it were a claim for… [read post]
31 May 2010, 5:09 am
The trial judge found that “[t]he push carried enough force that Piresferreira was pushed approximately a foot. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 6:22 am
PERSONAL INJURY – COMMON LAW INDEMNIFICATION CLAIMS – WORKERS' COMPENSATION LAW § 11 – "GRAVE INJURY" Eddine v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 11:30 pm
In Foley v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 1:30 pm
The court commented:Litigation has now been on foot for almost eight years and has cost hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal costs. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am
Once caught, he is given the choice of castration or amputation of his foot. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 5:44 am
An ulcer on his foot was ignored to the point of needing surgery. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 8:48 am
(Also sold were a six and a half foot model of the Starship Enterprise for over a half million dollars and another uniform and pants allegedly worn by Spiner/Data sold for almost $10,000.) [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 9:00 pm
§ 1343, as well as criminal forfeiture, U.S. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 1:15 pm
Supreme Court heard oral argument in Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 3:33 pm
In United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 12:49 pm
The former probably owes something to being an atheist. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 11:47 am
And not all oaths are equal… which is the point of this first post regarding the recent case of Weydert Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 9:49 am
The desire to protect the right of contracts and see that the contractor is paid is on equal footing with the rights of the owner when the edicts of the Act are followed, e.g. requiring notice of subcontractors performing work, and statements of amounts owed. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 1:14 pm
In reasons for judgment published today on the BC Supreme Court website (Patoma v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 5:11 pm
The inmate fell off his top bunk, hit the sink in the cell and struck the cell door, allegedly resulting in personal injuries to the inmate.Apparently, the inmate had chosen not to come down off the bed because that process involved putting a foot down on a sink, sliding down and putting his other foot on the sink, then stepping down onto the toilet, and finally to the floor.There's a joke in there somewhere, I just can't flush it out at the moment.Vinikoor v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 1:26 am
On June 2, the Courrt of Appeals published a divided opinion in People v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 10:01 pm
In today’s case (Rizzolo v. [read post]
