Search for: "Oxford v. Oxford"
Results 281 - 300
of 2,529
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2022, 3:44 am
In this two-part post, Emma Linch explores the judgment in Banks v Cadwalladr. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 4:05 pm
Democratic importance v Entertainment A free press performs an important role in society by holding elected officials to account. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 7:06 am
Solum, How NFIB v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 6:35 am
” Frontiero v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 1:30 am
Today, 11 June 2022, marks ten years since the start of regular blogging on Law and Religion UK with the post Lay employees and church discipline; this examined the increasingly-complex issue of the employment status and employment rights of lay employees of religious organisations in the case of Fernández Martínez v Spain [2012] ECHR 6030/07. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 7:00 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Constitutional Faith and Veneration, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:06 am
See United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 4:30 am
Howell Williams, Western Connecticut State University, “Workers Built Danbury: Deindustrialized Memory in a Hatting Town”Josh Kluever, Binghamton University (SUNY), “Sorry Waldman, We Just Couldn’t Help It: Socialist State Legislators in New York, 1912-1922”CARCERAL STATE, CARCERAL SOCIETYModerator: Elizabeth Hinton, Yale University Panelists: Max Felker-Kantor, Ball State University, “Arresting the Demand for Drugs: DARE and the Politics of Supply and Demand… [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 1:14 pm
Argentina, China v. [read post]
30 May 2022, 1:00 am
Review of the ecclesiastical court judgments during May 2022 Ten consistory court judgments were circulated in May, and those featured in this round-up relate to: Reordering, extensions and other building works Exhumation Churchyards and burials This summary also includes CDM Decisions and Safeguarding, Privy Council Business, and CFCE Determinations, as well as links to other posts relating to ecclesiastical law. [read post]
29 May 2022, 1:02 am
Christ Church Oxford safeguarding review On 26 May the Church of England announced that it was undertaking a review of the handling of safeguarding issues regarding the former Dean of Christ Church, Oxford, Dr Martyn Percy, and published the associated Terms of Reference. [read post]
25 May 2022, 8:40 am
Oxford University Press. [read post]
20 May 2022, 11:43 pm
As we noted in an earlier post, however, in Dean Martyn Percy v The Dean & Chapter of the Cathedral Church of Christ in Oxford of the Foundation of King Henry VIII [2020] UKET 3310878/2019, Employment Judge Andrew Clarke QC concluded at a preliminary hearing that Dean Percy was an employee for the purposes of s. 83(2)(a) of the Equality Act 2010, though not an employee of the Crown. [read post]
20 May 2022, 9:30 pm
ICYMI: A Smithsonian curator of medicine and science on Griswold v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 2:41 pm
Graham v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 2:17 am
See generally Lili Levi, ‘The Problem of Trans-National Libel’ (2012) 60 American Journal of Comparative Law 507. [4] Dow Jones & Co Inc v Gutnick (2002) 210 CLR 575. [5] But see Michael Douglas, ‘Characterisation of Breach of Confidence as a Privacy Tort in Private International Law’ (2018) 41 UNSW Law Journal 490. [6] Art 4(1); see Andrew Dickinson, The [read post]
8 May 2022, 2:35 pm
Minteer v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 2:33 pm
Roe v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:12 am
Registration for each event is in the links below:Seminar 1: Art, Law and Social Justice (Thursday 26 May 3:00-6:30 pm BST)Pierangelo Blandino (University of Lapland)Through a Legal Lens: Law, History, and Visual CultureElena Cooper (University of Glasgow)Art, Copyright and Justice in the Nineteenth Century: Connecting Abraham Solomon’s ‘Waiting for the Verdict’ and ‘Not Guilty’ (1857) to Graves’ Case (1869)Marcus V. [read post]
