Search for: "Oxley, in Re"
Results 281 - 300
of 475
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2010, 2:16 pm
We’re wasting millions that could be benefiting us as taxpayers. [read post]
12 May 2010, 4:29 am
The Reasons for Last Week's 1000-Point Plunge: Maybe We're Better Off Not Knowing? [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
Below, we discuss the most significant aspects of Elena Kagan’s experience and writings as they relate to the Supreme Court. [read post]
7 May 2010, 12:29 pm
In re Refco, Inc. [read post]
7 May 2010, 5:53 am
Now, some seven years after the passage of Sarbanes-Oxley, they’re paying him to give it up. [read post]
7 May 2010, 5:53 am
Now, some seven years after the passage of Sarbanes-Oxley, they’re paying him to give it up. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:51 am
” At Balkinization, Rick Pildes predicts that, if the Court strikes down the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 6:12 am
First, there can be no serious doubt that the rules reflect an expectation that boards will re-examine and in many cases improve their corporate governance policies and practices. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:57 pm
We're glad to announce that Richard Painter has joined us at Legal Ethics Forum. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 5:53 pm
Sarbanes-Oxley and other regulations require insurers to account accurately for their liabilities, which would include the workers' compensation claims of the insurer. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 10:58 pm
This fee pressure is no doubt a trend that is here to stay - even the concerns arising from the financial crisis seem to be outweighed by the pressure on bottom lines to cut professional fees wherever possible and to put everything out for re-bid. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 10:42 pm
In September 17, 2009, the SEC Enforcement Division took a very rare step and re-opened a previously closed probe of financial reporting irregularities at Overstock.com. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:51 am
If you think you’re immune then you’re fooling yourself. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:34 am
One of those additional categories of disqualification comes from the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 9:40 pm
When you read this stuff you're saying five years from now, you're going to cringe in embarrassment like the rest of us are doing as we speak. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
You’re more likely to get more government oversight and regulation, less of investor confidence and many more headaches. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 6:09 am
Every decade, it seems, government predictably considers and often passes legislation: in the late seventies, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; in the eighties, the Corporate Democracy Act (which, in fact, did not pass); in the early years of this century, Sarbanes Oxley; and most recently, Barney Frank and Chris Dodd’s almost Quixotic struggle to produce a pre-election reform bill. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 6:16 am
Editor’s Note: John Olson is a founding partner of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher’s Washington, D.C. office and a visiting professor at the Georgetown Law Center. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 4:41 am
This post is based on a Sullivan & Cromwell client memorandum by François Barrière, Gauthier Blanluet, Dominique Bompoint, Gérard Mazet, Richard Vilanova and Olivier de Vilmorin. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
Because they're so useful! [read post]
