Search for: "P D
v.
Review Board"
Results 281 - 300
of 823
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2019, 10:47 am
P. 4 as its starting point. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:34 pm
" In Re Andrew P. [read post]
9 May 2008, 10:30 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Order to transfer myspace.co.uk to MySpace overturned: (Out-Law), (IMPACT), New branding scheme for Ethiopian coffees: (Afro-IP), (IP finance), (IPKat), USPTO to appeal Tafas/GSK v Dudas: (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (PLI), (Patent Baristas), (Managing Intellectual Property), (IP Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Ladas… [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 8:41 am
Asked "What key obstacles impair your agency's ability to achieve its objectives, the SER responded:1) Budget cuts and restrictions on general revenue spending continue to impair the agency's ability to achieve its objectives.2) Incomplete, outdated, and/or inconsistent rules and procedures also impair the agency's ability to achieve its objectives.3) The size of the board - 13 members - is too large, costly and unnecessary.After the fiasco over the SCJC's attempt… [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:14 am
., v SBR Marketing Ltd., 11-CV-00304 (D. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:00 am
The question of whether a local authority owes a duty of care to the child to make such a claim arose recently in VL (A child suing by her litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) v Oxfordshire County Council [2010] EWHC 2091 (QB), [2010] All ER (D) 44 (Aug). [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 10:54 am
Ct. 2131 (U.S. 2016)), and in a post-grant review (PGR) proceeding (although this issue is being appealed to the Federal Circuit in Tinnus Enterprises, LLC v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 11:58 am
” State Board v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 7:45 pm
LEXIS 110 (N.H. 10/6/2010) Addressing proportionality review, “ instate case comparison is preferable. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 3:44 am
The court begins the opinion by explaining that[p]ro se petitioner Rajendrasinh Makwana petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' (`BIA’) final order of removal. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:56 am
Doyle for not speaking on his behalf at the September 2002 independent review board meeting. . . . [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal… [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 1:46 am
Hardsocg, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Karl D. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 10:01 am
’“ (People v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 4:07 am
Because the Court applied a highly deferential standard of review. [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 10:00 am
Review Board of the Ind. [read post]
16 May 2018, 11:03 am
D. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 12:35 am
Spreckels, 14 Haw. 399 (1902), 18 Haw. 91 (1906), aff'd 21 U.S. 208 (1909); see also Halstead v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 8:19 pm
He'd been paid. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am
In a series of recent posts (most recent here), I’ve been sharply critical of filings by the Solicitor General in the Hargan v. [read post]
