Search for: "P H I, INCORPORATED" Results 281 - 300 of 314
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2012, 11:06 am
State Election Commission [AIR 1997 P&H 164], in which the High Court was considering a similar question as to whether the Election Tribunal constituted under the Punjab State Election Commission Act, 1994, had the power to pass an injunction so as to restrain an elected representative from assuming office pending adjudication of an election petition filed against him. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 1:33 am
With the ALI annual meeting approaching, the new drafts of the various restatements and other projects are becoming available. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:13 pm
§ 19.7(h); ResQNet.com, Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 3:26 am by Sander van Rijnswou
I count a total of 12 different natural persons who are applicants to the priority documents in various combinations. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
I am happy to announce the publication of an article, "The Emerging Normative Structures of Transnational Law: Non-State Enterprises in Polycentric Asymmetric Global Orders," that appears in the B.Y.U. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 5:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
  June 1, 2019Appellate Division, Second Department Domestic Relations Law  253 does not provide that a defendant must provide plaintiff with a GetIn Cohen v Cohen, ‑‑‑ N.Y.S.3d ‑‑‑‑, 2019 WL 2112972, 2019 N.Y. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Where on entering the European phase the application documents are considered by the EPO not to meet the requirements of unity, with the result that a supplementary ESR is drawn up on only those parts of the application which relate to the invention first mentioned in the claims (R 164(1)), the applicant is not entitled to have a further search report drawn up to cover the other invention or inventions (point [9]).If you want the whole thing (and I think you should), here we go:Extent of… [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
September 16, 2018Recent LegislationLaws of 2018, Chapter 218, Amended CPLR 2305             Chapter 218 amended CPLR 2305, effective August 24, 2018 to add a new subdivision (d) which gives counsel the option of having trial material delivered to the attorney or self-represented party at the return address set forth in the subpoena, rather than to the clerk of the court. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
September 16, 2018Recent LegislationLaws of 2018, Chapter 218, Amended CPLR 2305             Chapter 218 amended CPLR 2305, effective August 24, 2018 to add a new subdivision (d) which gives counsel the option of having trial material delivered to the attorney or self-represented party at the return address set forth in the subpoena, rather than to the clerk of the court. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"2 The Court explained that “It is well established that "an arbitrator has broad discretion to determine a dispute and fix a remedy and that any contractual limitation on that discretion must be contained, either explicitly or incorporated by reference, in the arbitration clause itself'," citing Matter of State of New York [Dept. of Correctional Servs. [read post]