Search for: "P. v. Case" Results 281 - 300 of 25,594
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2012, 7:14 am by Allard Knook
Consequently, even though the sums involved in the measure at issue were not held permanently by the public authorities, the fact that they remained constantly under public control, and therefore available to the competent national authorities, was sufficient for them to be categorised as State resources (see, to that effect, Case C‑83/98 P France v Ladbroke Racing and Commission [2000] ). [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:48 am by Adam Baker
Turning to the second question Binnie J reviewed what was then the leading Canadian case on fundamental breach: Hunter Engineering Co. v Syncrude Canada Ltd. [1989] 1 SCR 426. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 7:10 pm
Crist, the Fourth Amendment case that Orin discussed the other day, p. 2:... [read post]