Search for: "PARKS V. CITIZENS PROPERTY"
Results 281 - 300
of 587
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2017, 5:35 am
Supreme Court, in Graham v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 4:26 pm
In a 5-4 ruling in Marrama v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
Sierra Club v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:07 pm
” (Citing Citizens’ Committee, 74 Cal.App.5th at 1170, and North Coast Rivers Alliance v. [read post]
Argument preview: Justices to consider constitutionality of cross-shaped war memorial on public land
21 Feb 2019, 10:37 am
In 1971, in a case called Lemon v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 11:22 am
City and County of San Francisco (2019) 33 Cal.App.5th 321 (“SOMA”) (my 4/5/19 post on which can be found here); (4) Citizens for a Sustainable Treasure Island v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:14 pm
In Snyder v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:46 am
The Sullivan Cases Abernathy v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 3:19 am
Lee statue located in a public park. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 6:51 am
The point of departure in the argument in Egbert v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 10:09 am
” See Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 8:55 am
Save Lafayette Trees, et. al v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 6:41 pm
For example, in Ellis v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 5:53 am
The teachers parked their vehicles in front of the school along both sides of the street, in legal parking spots off of school property. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 1:49 pm
Neighborhood Ass'n of the Back Bay, Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 12:08 pm
Robinson v. [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 6:44 am
City of Highland Park 15-133Issue: (1) Whether the Constitution allows the government to prohibit law-abiding, responsible citizens from protecting themselves, their families, and their homes with a class of constitutionally protected “arms” that includes the most popular rifles in the nation; and (2) whether the Constitution allows the government to prohibit law-abiding, responsible citizens from protecting themselves, their families, and their homes with… [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 4:44 pm
(Citing Tahoe Vista Concerned Citizens v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
Stutts, 521 S.W.2d 575, 576 (Tenn. 1975), where we wrote: It is the settled law in this state that private citizens, as such, cannot maintain an action complaining of the wrongful acts of public officials unless such private citizens aver special interest or a special injury not common to the public generally. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 3:51 pm
” (Citing Kuhn v. [read post]
