Search for: "PARKS V. CITIZENS PROPERTY"
Results 281 - 300
of 587
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2015, 9:09 am
Such are the fundamental philosophical lessons of the Sixth District Court of Appeal’s recently published opinion in Save Our Big Trees v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:30 am
Cuomo and Connecticut Citizens’ Defense League v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:48 am
Citizens for Environmental Responsibility v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 11:11 am
OPR proposes to add a new subdivision (f) to this section to codify the water supply analysis rules set forth in Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 2:25 pm
” (Tahoe Vista Concerned Citizens v. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 7:22 am
A good citizen should have to respond. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 11:40 am
Under normal circumstances they can, but in this case, they cannot.Under the government-speech doctrine, the government can promote a message on its property without having to afford equal time or other speech opportunities to citizens. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 6:02 am
From Gaymon v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 3:19 pm
Protection of firearms in parking lots was improved. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 9:28 am
Citizens for Environmental Responsibility v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 11:15 am
Alena Hammer v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
After 10 years, there is finally some development planned for the condemned property--a park is planned for the parcel that was Ms. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 6:40 am
Windsor and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 6:37 pm
Invoking Pleasant Grove v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:42 pm
Assn. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 8:22 am
Texas argued that as government property, the state has the right to control the language on the plates, and citizens have the right to display (or not display) the vanity plates. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:00 am
’ In a democratic state, academic libraries, which possess some of the greatest resources in the land, are required to be open to the public so people may educate themselves to become informed and active citizens. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
At the conclusion of the hearing the court made two findings beyond a reasonable doubt, to wit (1) that on March 8, 1994, respondent willfully violated the final order of protection by attempting to gain entry to petitioner’s residence and (2) that on March 11, 1994, respondent willfully violated the final order of protection by having a vehicle lawfully parked on petitioner’s property towed from that property with false representations by respondent that he… [read post]
15 May 2015, 4:27 pm
However, many commentators thought that such injunctions in relation to future infringement applied only to to intellectual property claims, as provided for specifically in statute, until the recent case of Cartier International and Others v BskyB and others ([2014] EWHC 3354 (Ch)). [read post]
12 May 2015, 12:51 pm
Keep Our Mountains Quiet v. [read post]
