Search for: "PEOPLE v. TAYLOR"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,119
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2022, 5:05 am
" Further, said the court, "[I]t is the responsibility of the administrative agency to weigh the evidence and choose from among competing inferences therefrom and, so long as the inference drawn and the ultimate determination made are supported by substantial evidence, it is not for the court to substitute its judgment for that of the administrative agency," citing Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152… [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 5:05 am
" Further, said the court, "[I]t is the responsibility of the administrative agency to weigh the evidence and choose from among competing inferences therefrom and, so long as the inference drawn and the ultimate determination made are supported by substantial evidence, it is not for the court to substitute its judgment for that of the administrative agency," citing Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152… [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 9:36 am
Murphy, Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Work of the International Law Commission International DecisionsMaiko Meguro, State of the Netherlands v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 12:53 pm
” In Taylor v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 12:33 pm
In 2006, People v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 3:11 am
.'" Judges Seeherman, Taylor, and Ritchie were not swayed. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 2:51 pm
There was a lot of discussion around the applicability of Laird v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 6:04 am
A majority of the California Supreme Court did not so hold in People v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 9:56 pm
Contrast Sawyer with the Michigan Supreme Court's decision from this May in People v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 5:33 am
This point was considered in the case of Howlett v Holding ([2006] EWHC 41 (QB)). [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 6:52 am
[Point of Law] Michigan Justice Elizabeth Weaver continues to lose it [ATL; People v. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 9:37 am
But what makes social media platforms different is their ability to shape public discourse not by promoting their own messages but by silencing voices they deem to be harmful…. the bottleneck position that comes with control of these platforms brings with it a remarkable power to censor” By virtue of making publication decisions, every publisher necessarily “silences” the voices of people it chooses not to publish. [read post]
16 Sep 2007, 5:08 am
Supreme Court issued its 1954 decision declaring racial segregation unconstitutional in Brown v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:07 am
In People v. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 11:58 am
The case Nancy Wells v. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 11:58 am
The case Nancy Wells v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 4:10 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 11:26 am
No. 1J v. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 5:18 pm
And, by leaving people like Ms. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 4:37 am
’ Yet another, S.S., told Bell Rainey commented to her that he thought she had `”messed” with some nasty people’ and suggested that he otherwise would have, in S.S.'s words, `turn[ed][her] back “straight” from being “gay. [read post]
