Search for: "PETERS v. HOLDER"
Results 281 - 300
of 398
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2011, 5:28 pm
The first word on the matter was Judge Neal Peters McCurn in Indium Corp. of America v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
, (EDTexweblog.com), (Patent Prospector), (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (IPBiz), (Against Monopoly), (Philip Brooks), (IPBiz), Indian government to consider whether to grant compulsory licenses to Natco for the exportation of generic versions of Tarceva and Sutent (Sunitinib) to Nepal : (Spicy IP), (Spicy IP), (Spicy IP), (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), (IP Law360), (Spicy IP),GlobalGlobal - GeneralIntellectual privilege or imaginary property? [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:23 pm
Attorney General Eric Holder announced that the Obama Administration is looking to pass legislation that would provide EU citizens with a right to judicial redress in U.S. courts if their personal information that was shared for law enforcement purposes is later intentionally or wilfully disclosed. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm
In the 1964 case of New York Times v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
Oakley Capital, whose founder and managing partner is the reportedly significant British Conservative Party donor, Peter Dubens, at least for a while, has acquired majority ownership of v-Lex, as the latter continues to innovate and embed itself in markets. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 12:13 pm
: Ex parte Godwin (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Software should be patentable (Patent Fools) (PLI) (PLI) Software method claims: Bilski in light of Benson (Patently-O) [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:02 am
Holder, in which she argued earlier this Term in support of the federal statute banning “material support” for terrorism. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
IAM/Thomson Reuters survey says: EPO (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Patent plutonomies (IPEG) Mandatory disclosure, PCT and WIPO conspiracy theories (Spicy IP) IP for you business: Reducing patent litigation budgets (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Seeking to sell your patent to a big company? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
IAM/Thomson Reuters survey says: EPO (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Patent plutonomies (IPEG) Mandatory disclosure, PCT and WIPO conspiracy theories (Spicy IP) IP for you business: Reducing patent litigation budgets (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Seeking to sell your patent to a big company? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
IAM/Thomson Reuters survey says: EPO (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Patent plutonomies (IPEG) Mandatory disclosure, PCT and WIPO conspiracy theories (Spicy IP) IP for you business: Reducing patent litigation budgets (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Seeking to sell your patent to a big company? [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:55 am
Study suggests ‘not much (Peter Zura’s 271 Patent Blog) Green sunset? [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
Last month, in Kagan v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:46 am
It has been held that the right holder did not have an obligation to provide URL’s for the content that the platform should remove in its take down request and a simple indication in the title of the video would be sufficient. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 7:53 pm
AIG created the opportunity for the possible change of this traditional control.[4] In AFSCME v. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 6:45 pm
Peter Wentz, testified that the physicians receiving total homocysteine assays from LabCorp carry out the correlating step. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
: In re Kubin and KSR International Co v Teleflex Inc (Patent Docs) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: USPTO, Tafas & GSK request extension for reconsideration (IP Watchdog) CAFC: Patent on sex aid is obvious: Ritchie v Vast Resources (AKA Topco) (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Assigning patent rights: Euclid Chemical v Vector Corrosion (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) District Court E D Michigan: LEDdynamics wins summary judgment in LED tube patent suit… [read post]
8 May 2009, 9:00 am
Canada US targets Canada over copyright in Special 301 Report (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) (At Last... the 1709 Copyright Blog) (Michael Geist) Federal Court awards $250,000 to Microsoft over sale of two computers with unauthorised copies of Microsoft software: Microsoft v PC Village et al (Excess Copyright) CIRA: Complaint dismissed, costs awarded against… [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 9:02 pm
Not necessarily.Rumors have been circulating that the new EO will apply the same criteria as EO 13769 but expressly exempt green card holders, student visa holders, and other people with substantial contacts with the United States. [read post]
