Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US" Results 281 - 300 of 4,537
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2014, 5:27 am by Amy Howe
In an op-ed for The National Law Journal (registration or subscription required), Ron Honberg urges the Court to grant the petition for certiorari filed by Texas death row inmate Scott Panetti and “announce a precise standard for assessing a prisoner’s competency for execution. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 9:46 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
  That is true, but Judge Prost’s point and the inducement standard are not solely about the fact of infringement. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 10:16 am by Rosalind English
In any event the EU law in question (Regulation No 1/2005) does not lay down, in precise terms, the height of the internal compartments. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 2:32 am by Michael DelSignore
Courts have been relying specifically on one definition of this standard, published over 150 years ago in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 11:46 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) On December 5th, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a Fourth Amendment case, Messerschmidt v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 6:12 am
Said ConvaTec, this still infringed because, in a scientific context, the standard practice was to express numerical values to a particular degree of accuracy; using the standard rounding convention, the number five was always rounded up. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 3:14 pm by Shannon Togawa Mercer
Garland points out that the petitioner hasn’t argued that he can get relief under a clear-and-convincing-evidence standard; in other words, counsel hasn’t argued that the result of the case would be different if the clear-and-convincing-evidence standard was used instead of the preponderance of the evidence test that the courts used last time around. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 12:38 pm
O'Keefe's complaint easily satisfies this standard, precisely alleging that the defendants have used the John Doe proceeding as a pretext to target conservative groups across the state... [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 10:34 am
Biosig Instruments, Inc., No. 13-369 (June 2, 2014).IssueThis case, involving a heart­ rate monitor used with exercise equipment, concerns the proper reading of the statute’s clarity and precision de­ mand. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 12:47 am
In particular, may the offer be made subject to the condition that the standard-essential patent is actually used and/or is shown to be valid? [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 12:58 pm by Jason Rantanen
Judge Newman’s Articulation of the Post-Teva standard of review. [read post]
7 May 2019, 6:10 am by Eric Goldman
The court relies on the Roommates.com “neutral tools” standard, as clarified by Goddard v. [read post]