Search for: "PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY v. CORPORATION COMMISSION"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,186
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2017, 10:00 am
Martin O’Connor (Addisons) reports on the recent case of Upaid Systems Ltd v Telstra Corporation Limited (No 4) [2016] FCA 1514 where the Federal Court of Australia recently grappled with the issue. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 11:29 am
Flippo v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 8:39 am
Brand X Internet Services, 545 U.S. 967 (2005), the Supreme Court deferred to the Federal Communications Commission’s ruling that, under the Communications Act of 1934, cable broadband providers are “information service providers” and not “telecommunications carriers. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:25 am
Case of Ahmet Atahür Söyler v. [read post]
contempt finding saves FTC's $120 million victory against real estate scammer even after AMG Capital
11 Nov 2022, 11:21 am
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 10:09 am
Cox, alluding to the AFSCME v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 6:00 am
In 2010 in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 2:15 am
In this article we distil critical lessons from the Federal Court’s recent decision in Australian Securities and Investments Commission v RI Advice Group Pty Ltd[1] and practical actions to be taken by Boards and executive management. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:55 am
Public companies also should weigh their prospectus and other disclosure obligations. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm
On 2 March 2022, Nicklin J gave an ex tempore judgment dismissing the libel claim in Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation v Burgis. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 3:28 pm
Despite the paucity of enforcement actions, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act nevertheless made clear that lawyers representing public companies have gatekeeping responsibilities. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 9:54 am
The Travelers Companies, Inc., 413 F. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 3:54 am
How the Supreme Court’s Lawson Case Impacts Public Companies In this podcast, Steve Pearlman of Proskauer addresses whistleblower protections in the context of the recent Supreme Court decision – Lawson v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 6:53 am
Alpine Securities Corporation, a broker-dealer providing clearing services for microcap securities, had been charged by the SEC with violating Exchange Act Rule 17a-8 by filing fatally deficient SARs or by failing to file any SAR when it had a duty to do so. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 3:26 am
The headline from this decision, in a suit brought by a minority shareholder of a translation services company against the controlling shareholder, is the court’s grant of interim injunctive relief based on application of Corporation A’s shareholders’ agreement to later-acquired or later-formed Corporations B and C. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
Uber’s own drivers have brought a class action in a case called Yucesoy v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:42 am
Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued further interpretive guidance to assist public companies in preparing disclosures about cybersecurity risks and incidents (the “2018 SEC Guidance”). [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 4:17 pm
P is for Pickup Pal, the ride sharing service that was forced to change its Ontario operations after Trentway-Wagar, an Ontario bus company, filed a complaint with the Ontario Transportation Board over the legality of the service. [read post]
